Answer:
they wanted to cut out the Muslim and Italian middlemen, as the prices increased each time goods were passed from one trader to another trader, and gain direct access to the riches of Asia. this would require finding a route to the country that bypassed the Mediterranean sea
Answer:
1. yes, this is justifiable because if someone is attacking you, you have to defend yourself.
2. Yes, even if the country is neutral, the people of that country should be protected against an invasion.
3. No, a lot of people die in wars and it isn't worth it just gor alliances.
4. No, war will not make your countru stronger in any way, it will just make things worse.
5. Yes, power and territory in other parts of the world will help your country gain influence if you are a good leader.
6. Yes, your country will not survive without certain resources.
7. No, a war will not prevent another war.
For the answer to the question above, I believe the answer is because
<u><em>the people in New </em></u><u><em>England</em></u> <u><em>had more work experience.
</em></u><em><u /></em><u />That's why industries sprung in the New England.
I hope this helps. Have a nice day ahead!
<u><em /></u>
Answer:
The colonists right to have a say in government was removed when their legislatures were dissolved, and by the ongoing lack of Parliamentary representation for the colonies.