1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
balu736 [363]
2 years ago
7

Can anyone answer these !!!

History
1 answer:
Nata [24]2 years ago
3 0

5. answer

i Don't buy newspapers ever.

I read headlines mostly on flip news once or twice a week .

I get to watch CNN day and night because my client likes "the company". at least for only seven shifts.

it is a bit like watching the bold and the beautiful same story different people counties and the theme music is very CNN.

You might be interested in
How far was Nasser responsible for the outbreak of the Suez War of 1956? Please make it detailed i have to write a 600 word essa
dsp73

Answer:

The Suez crisis is often portrayed as Britain's last fling of the imperial dice.

Still, there were powerful figures in the "establishment" - a phrase coined in the early 1950s - who could not accept that Britain was no longer a first-rate power. Their case, in the context of the times, was persuasive: we had nuclear arms, a permanent seat on the UN security council, and military forces in both hemispheres. We remained a trading nation, with a vital interest in the global free passage of goods.

But there was another, darker, motive for intervention in Egypt: the sense of moral and military superiority which had accreted in the centuries of imperial expansion. Though it may now seem quaint and self-serving, there was a widespread and genuine feeling that Britain had responsibilities in its diminishing empire, to protect its peoples from communism and other forms of demagoguery.

Much more potently, there was ingrained racism. When the revolutionaries in Cairo dared to suggest that they would take charge of the Suez canal, the naked prejudice of the imperial era bubbled to the surface. The Egyptians, after all, were among the original targets of the epithet, "westernised oriental gentlemen. They were the Wogs.

King Farouk, the ruler of Egypt, was forced into exile in mid-1952. A year later, a group of army officers formally took over the government which they already controlled. The titular head of the junta was General Mohammed Neguib. The real power behind the new throne was an ambitious and visionary young colonel who dreamed of reasserting the dignity and freedom of the Arab nation, with Egypt at the heart of the renaissance. His name was Gamal Abdel Nasser.

Nasser's first target was the continued British military presence in the Suez canal zone. A source of bitter resentment among many Egyptians, that presence was a symbol of British imperial dominance since the 1880s. In 1954, having established himself as uncontested leader of Egypt, Nasser negotiated a new treaty, under which British forces would leave within 20 months.

At first, the largely peaceful transition of power in Egypt was little noticed in a world beset by turmoil and revolution.

Explanation:

Hope this helps.

7 0
2 years ago
What was the significance of the British Reform Act of 1832?
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

It reformed the electoral system (by getting rid of tiny districts), gave representation to many cities, gave vote to small landowners, tenant farmers, etc.

Explanation:

idk sorry

7 0
2 years ago
What technology allowed for the rise of European military dominance in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries?
Vinil7 [7]
There was more than one technology that was developed at the time, but one technolgoy that surely made a strong impact and also enabled Europe becoming the dominant military force was the invention and perfection of military tactics together with muskets and cannons. This made them practically unstopable against any native population around the world. 
8 0
3 years ago
Why was there an "arms race" between the U.S. and Soviet Union? What types of
natta225 [31]

Answer:

An "Arms Race" was a race between the 2 super powers to develop weapons of massive destruction which were considered High Class Destruction Weapons. United Socialist Soviet Republics have developed weapons like Inter Continental Ballistic missiles of Medium and Trans-Continental ranges as well as a devastating and terrifying weapon known as the Tsar Bomba which is 57 megatons, 1,500 times more devastating then a bomb on dropped Hiroshima. In fact the Tsar Bomba could leave an explosion behind bigger then all the ammunition, bombs, torpedoes and other weapons used in World War 2 by all countries combined.

4 0
3 years ago
In 1676, what happened to end King Philip’s War?
Dovator [93]
The answer is C took the test
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the united states contribute to the end of world war ii in europe?
    13·1 answer
  • What branch of government has the power to start the impeachment process A. Senate B. Supreme Court C. U.S House of Representati
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following did not encourage african americans to abandon the republican party?
    5·1 answer
  • What are some of the contributory factors that can propel one to immigrate to the United States of America?
    10·1 answer
  • Please reflect on the activity. Give a brief explanation of the
    15·1 answer
  • Drag the events into the correct chronological order. Place the first event at the top.
    11·2 answers
  • Who was involved in the suger act 1764
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a given power to the federal government Making marriage laws. Declaring war. Creating local government
    14·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLEY!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Pls help ill give brainlest!!!!
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!