1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergejj [24]
3 years ago
5

What was President Polk's attitude towards the idea of Manifest Destiny? A. He was a supporter of American territorial expansion

. B. He was against using money to buy territory. C. He was in favor of expansion but through peaceful means only.
History
1 answer:
vampirchik [111]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A. President Polk had a positive attitude towards the idea of Manifest Destiny, since he was a supporter of American territorial expansion.

Explanation:

James Knox Polk became President of the United States at the age of 49, the youngest by then. His term went from March 4, 1845 to March 4, 1849.

In 1845, the United States accepted Texas into the 28th State. Although Texas had seceded from Mexico as early as 1836, the US decision significantly weakened the country's relations with Mexico. Later, the United States sent troops to secure the controversial border, thus further escalating the dispute. This eventually led to the outbreak of the Mexican American War in 1846. The United States won the war in 1848. In the Peace Treaty, Mexico withdrew all its claims on Texas and ceded the present states of California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah. After the war, Polk tried for a moment to negotiate with Spain about buying Cuba, but the Spanish were not interested in the proposal.  

In his election campaign, Polk had promised to conquer the Oregon Territory from the UK. However, as president, he did not want to embark on a costly war with the British, but instead began negotiating the surrender of the territories. Polk threatened to go to war if no deal was agreed, thus gaining Britain's current states of Oregon, Idaho and Washington, as well as parts of Montana and Wyoming. Other notable achievements of the Polk presidency included the incorporation of Iowa and Wisconsin into the United States.

You might be interested in
Which of the following explains a significant positive impact that the immigration of large populations of Chinese people had on
sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer:

Chinese immigrants established businesses and religious centers that provided their new cities with greater access to elements of Chinese culture such as arts, cuisine, and religion.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
As a function of government in a modern market economy, how might a government respond to a market failure
Ne4ueva [31]
A government may mediate in the market to re-set up proficiency. 
The U.S. government utilizes two sorts of approaches—money related strategy and monetary arrangement—to impact financial execution. Both have a similar reason: to enable the economy to accomplish development, full business, and value soundness. Fiscal strategy is utilized to control the cash supply and loan costs.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following DECREASED as an early result of the Industrial Revolution?
Natalija [7]
A-life expectancy because of the bad working conditions it caused disease
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was left out from voting in the early years
vredina [299]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

people thought that poor men shouldn’t be allowed to vote because they were poor. Native indian and women also werent allowed to to vote. Hope this helps!!✨✨✨

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What philosophers influenced the Declaration of Independence?
    13·1 answer
  • How did ""the discovery of silver in Bolivia contribute to the genius of William Shakespeare""?
    11·1 answer
  • Witch of the following was included in Patrick Henry’s Virginia resolves
    15·1 answer
  • Joseph Stalin developed “five-year plans” to direct
    15·1 answer
  • How were the lives of african women altered by colonial economies?
    5·1 answer
  • How did the us economy change in the years after the civil war
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a similarity between the haung river and indus Valley civilizations
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the main reason why more Jews did not escape to other countries, such as the United States A. They cou
    15·1 answer
  • Uhm the questions speak for themselves and please answer within the next 1 hr and 30 mins
    6·2 answers
  • 2
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!