<span>First off they had brahmins which were priests and teachers , already have some since of organization, because they have education. They also had kings and other types of rulers , and divisions of warriors. They also had cultivators which can refer to artisans , merchants, traders etc. Basically they were a functioning organization with people who all had their own job serving their purpose.
</span>
<span>The system is that policymakers are elected to serve and represent their constituents. The policymakers also have their own personal beliefs. These beliefs may or may not correspond to their constituents beliefs. Also, it must be considered that it's a livelihood for the policy maker and they must do what is necessary to remain in office. The policymakers must balance these factors in determining which policies to support and which ones not to support.</span>
Institutionally,
imperialism regularly brought about the centralization of energy. At the point
when settlements wound up noticeably autonomous they regularly either had
establishments that had a tendency to unify control passed on from frontier
run, or social and financial structures that unified power in a little first
class that tended to oppose development toward democratization.
Socially,
previous provincial states had subjective fringes that made it hard to make a
bound together and lucid society. Intensifying the ethnic divisions created by
subjective outskirts was the way that amid frontier period, the gap and
overcome strategy was regularly utilized. This made an atmosphere of doubt
between ethnic gatherings that showed itself in ethnic clash in the autonomous
states.
A few
experts differ that imperialism can be reprimanded for the worldwide south's
underdevelopment today. Some battle that Africa was immature before Europeans
arrived, so the clarification for the present underdevelopment must be looked
for in culture, geology or history that pre-date imperialism. They additionally
take note of that a few nations that were never colonized or just quickly
colonized likewise encounter underdevelopment today.
Different
pundits call attention to that the genuine pilgrim structure was very little in
many states and that such a little framework of people couldn't have caused the
far reaching changes that are frequently credited to pioneer run the show.
Also, a few
commentators point to the way that expansionism bettered the general population
in the states in some courses by enhancing future, training and wellbeing
rehearses. Further, the way that some previous settlements have made some
significant monetary progress likewise indicates the way that imperialism was
not determinative of financial results today.
The characteristic of rule of law tha was violated in this situation is the transparency of institutions.
<h3>What is rule of law?</h3>
This means that a nation should be governed by set and solid laws as opposed to the arbitrary decisions of the leader.
In this case, the leaders weren't transparent in their dealings.
Learn more about law on:
brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
Because Johnson was thinking in terms of conventional warfare. He thought that because his army was larger, his air force was tougher and better trained, his navy was massively larger, the equipment provided to his troops infinitely better, there would be no contest.
He did not understand 2 things about Vietnam.
1. He forgot that the Vietnamese had been fighting the French (and beating them). The French in effect had changed the Vietnamese into battle hardened soldiers.
2. The Vietnamese fought a guerrilla style of warfare. The came the delivered hard jabs and disappeared into the night. Conventional war tools don't easily adapt to that kind of warfare.
