Answer:
The Democratic Party was the party of slavery, and is the party of unequal treatment based on race, rather than equal opportunity based on merit.
Explanation:
Andrew Jackson was related to the Democratic Party, as it was widely known with it's history of impeding on people's rights based on skin-color or national origin. He also was the embodiment of many of the beliefs of the Democratic Party. Firstly, he embraced the usage of slavery, and was a ardent holder of slaves. The Democratic Party had always worked for keeping the institution of slavery as a means of not only workforce and profit, but also as a way to degrade "non-whites" into being second-class humans, (also commonly known as sub-humans). Piggy-backing off of the issue of slavery, Jackson also campaigned against many of the Native American tribes that were located to the west of the then-US, starting wars and taking lands from the defeated Native American tribes. Again, the Native American tribes were classified as sub-humans, and did not receive any benefits that would generally be implied to a white-US citizen.
This led to the unpopularity of Jackson within the Whig-Republican circles, and he was succeeded by Martin van Buren.
Answer:
1. A
2. B
3. D
4. A
5. Civilian Conservation Corps, Civil Works Administration, Farm Security Administration, National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and the Social Security Administration.
<em>Sorry, the answers to number 5 were cut off, so I tried my best.</em>
Brainlist Pls!
The United Kingdom comprises four geographic and historical parts—England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
Answer:
I feel like I would possibly be given little to no rights. As a minority myself, it'll be most difficult for me to survive under dictatorship. I wouldn't have any rights as a minority, possibly no self worth, etc. Dictators usually pick out the best people to be treated equally so that possibly will not apply to me or others. So, in conclusion, it'll be much different under a dictatorship than a democracy because of who I am as a person
Explanation:
C. To show that duck and cover would protect a person during a bomb attack.
That answer doesn't make much sense to us now, but at the time of the 1951 <em>Duck and Cover </em>film released by the US Civil Defense office, that was the message the government was conveying to the American people.
If you look at the other options in the answer choices, all of them (A,B,D) are essentially saying the same thing -- that this was a method that would not work. So the only unique answer in the set -- which was the message from Civil Defense -- was that "duck and cover" was a helpful strategy in the event of a nuclear attack. Truthfully, it would not have been.
