A thesis statement about the play <em>Hamlet</em> is: Hamlet's quest for power was his ultimate undoing as he thought he could not be killed by a man born of a woman, but Laertes' weapon, poisoned by Claudius killed him.
<h3>What happened in Hamlet?</h3>
Hamlet is set on a path of revenge after his father was killed by his brother Claudius, in a bid to usurp him.
Hamlet consults witches to find out about the future and he is told that he would be king (Hamlet 1, 3) and this sets off a chain of events as he plots to become King of Scotland.
Hamlet is power-hungry and does anything to gain power, including consulting witches, engaging in several murders, feigning madness, etc but he is ultimately killed by the sword of Laertes' poisoned weapon.
Read more about Hamlet here:
brainly.com/question/1150844
#SPJ1
Is there a prompt, requirements, or instructions? If so I can help
<span>Strong language often means strong feelings. You are more likely to use swear words or just very expressive language when you are feeling strong emotions, such as agitation, anger, rage, etc. When you are feeling weak emotions, you are more likely to be controlled and behaved and not use strong language.</span>
Answer:
Correct Answers:
The central idea of the passage: <u>-recruiters used deceptive practices</u>
The evidence the passage provide to support the central idea: <u>-logical</u>
Explanation:
In the passage, the central idea was about the deceptive approach of the recruiters in hiring people. This is based on the complaints by one of them about not being told that he would be going to Trinidad and not returning.
<em>And, the evidence which support this central idea was logical. Because, if the recruiters had not used tricks, they would not be able to recruit anyone. </em><em>This is because, none of them is willing to cross the water no matter the circumstances.</em>
B, It gives a reason WHY being in a study group is an effective way to study.