Answer: Okay so, if you think on the domestic level of things we come to the conclusion of armed assault, robbing, murders, and other federal crimes that we do not need to speak on
for the foreign affairs you may have a messed up trade or conflict between one another, you have terrorism and ward and spies gathering intell on american plans
Explanation:
i am very sorry if this is not correct the answers I gave were from only what i understood and not parenthetical evidence nor biased information.
Using the history, we got republican presidential candidate William Mckinley won the 1896 election.
The 1896 Republican National Convention which convened at the Wigwam, a temporary structure in St. Louis, on the June 16. With most credentials battles settled in the McKinley's favor, the roll of delegates drawn up by the RNC heavily favored the Ohioan, though the Reed, Allison, Morton and Quay remained in race. The credentials report served as the test vote, which the McKinley forces won easily. Hanna, who was the delegate from Ohio, was in full control of the convention.
Hence, the republican presidential candidate William Mckinley a. won the 1896 election.
To know more about history, visit here:
brainly.com/question/3583505
#SPJ4
Answer:
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the Warsaw Pact
Explanation:
In the mid 1950's, the tensions between the communist east and capitalist west were constantly on the rise. This led to the formation of military alliances from both sides. The Western countries formed NATO, a military organization initially consisted of USA, Canada, and Western European countries. The Soviets responded adequately, and they formed the Warsaw Pact with their allies, which was also a military organization. The reason for the formation of these two organizations was to protect the interests of the member countries, be it safety, political, economical, social, or zones of influence. Both organizations were constantly pilling up more and more weaponry and were constantly increasing the armies, heavily investing in its development, equipment, and training.
Answer:
to confront the problem at hand ...or just to avoid at all do nothing about it
As of 2007, the richest 1% held about 38% of all privately held wealth in the United States. while the bottom 90% held 73.2% of all debt. According to The New York Times, the richest 1 percent in the United States now own more wealth than the bottom 90 percent.Today, the top 1 percent of households own more wealth than the bottom 90 percent combined.
