Answer:
I think that the answer of this question:
a.By using classical and mythological themes
The correct answer is increasing sectionalism.
During the early to mid 19th century, the American economy was developing in very different ways. For example, the Northern states were becoming more industrialized and focused significantly on the production of manufactured goods. On the other hand, Southern states still relied heavily on slave labor to grow cash crops (especially cotton). This was vastly different than the North, as slavery had been outlawed in many of these states.
The issue of slavery, it's existence, and its extension into new territories in the west caused significant problems between Northern and Southern states. This was especially true when Northern and Southern politicians meet in Congress to discuss these issues.
I think it was government..but if im right someone tell me
They find artifacts? There are no statements.
-White variety of visions of reconstructed south
<span>-President Lincolns plan involved showing mercy to south </span>
-Lincoln envisioned a peacful and easygoing reconstruction
<span>-Radical republicans in congress envisioned a forceful reconstruction in which they wouldn't led former confederate leaders/officers hold office, and they would force them to be more like union. </span>
-Johnson didn't even seem to have a vision. He though he could cheer confederate buddies to office and all would go well, this is oblivisouly not true...
<span>-Lincoln wanted to protect African Americans , while radical republicans also did, Johnson didn't </span>
<span>-These visions reflected old political parties and social divisions in many ways. Radical Republicans wanted south to be more like union, which is what caused the war in a sense. Lincoln desire to stop slavery was the evident and the same before and after the war. Many things such as black codes, enforcement acts, and even the tenure office act resulted from these visions. the south got even more violent towards blacks</span>
