1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhannawk [14.2K]
3 years ago
7

Match each view point to the correct leader.

History
2 answers:
Vedmedyk [2.9K]3 years ago
8 0
I think Abraham Lincoln opposed the law and believed slavery was a moral issue
Sonja [21]3 years ago
5 0
Abraham Lincoln opposed the Kansas Nebraska act

Stephen Douglas introduced the Kansas Nebraska act

Stephen Douglas wanted slavery to continue

Abraham Lincoln believed slavery was a moral issue
You might be interested in
Are fortifications and defenses the ONLY thing needed to defend a Kingdom/Country?
Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Natural fortifications also helps defend a country. For example the Alps in Italy defends them very well. Rivers can also be a defensive position a country can fall back to. So no, fortifications and defenses arent the only thing. Nature is able to help too.

5 0
3 years ago
What is meant by we glory in the name of abolitionist for it signifies friendship for all in servitude and slavery what does tha
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

The abolitionists of the North are the only true and unyielding friends on whom you can rely. ... We glory in the name of abolitionists, for it signifies friendship for all who are pining in servitude.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Why did the committee of public safety consider monopoly to be such a serious crime?
Doss [256]
The committee of public safety consider monopoly to be a serious crime,because can make someone to monopolize the world so no one else can buy any bussiness,so they can make their own prices as they want without having any problems.

3 0
3 years ago
“If a nation is attacked the only recourse is to attack back” Agree or disagree and why?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Not really,

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
 some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The goal of NAFTA was to create a " between the United
Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

The last one. Free trade zone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 5. Explaining How did colonial powers govern their<br> colonies?
    10·2 answers
  • Describe the demonstration of Martin Luther Kings speech
    13·2 answers
  • 4. What do all the principles of government have in common?
    15·1 answer
  • Which equation can be used to check c, the quotient of 3,402-18?<br><br> It’s math
    14·1 answer
  • Cause and effects of the Great Depression
    6·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    14·1 answer
  • (Pls I need help!!)What did the Declaration of the Right of Man and of the Citizen do?
    13·1 answer
  • When did the United States get Puerto Rico?
    6·2 answers
  • Someone please help will mark as brainliest
    5·2 answers
  • How did him Braddock get back into boxing
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!