In his book, A People's History of the United States, Howard Zinn cites examples from US colonial history of the gap between rich and poor in colonial life.
A key study cited by Zinn examined tax registers from Boston, showing that the top 1% of the population held 25% of the wealth in 1687, and that by 1770, the top 1% of property owners in Boston owned 44% of the wealth. The study also noted that the bulk of Boston's population were not property owners. The percentage of adult males in Boston who owned no property doubled between 1687 and 1770 (from 14% to 29%).
Zinn cited additional items, regarding overcrowding of poorhouses (giving a notable example from New York) and a general increase throughout the colonies of the "wandering poor" who had no real means of support. He also cited examples of workers' strikes against employers in the colonies because of low wages.
<span>Many Americans were exposed to the ideas of the federalists by the "Federalist Papers". These papers, which consisted of a set of articles, were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, although they originally didn't publish these articles under there own name. The articles were published in journals across New York. The articles were later bundled and were called the "Federalist Papers".</span>
Mark,john and noah those are three testments
Answer:
¨In England a King hath little more to do than to make war and give away places; which, in plain terms, is to [impoverish] the nation and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousand sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain! Of more worth is one honest man to society, and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.¨ By reading this passage you can infer the answer is: To fight wars and give away land
Explanation: Mark brainliest?
Answer:
1) Making Inferences In what ways do you think the events during Elizabeth’s youth molded her character?
- Although these events somewhat traumatized the Princess, they also molded her into a strong, independent personality.
Explanation:
2) Interpreting Significance Queen Elizabeth’s refusal to marry was a controversial political decision at the time. Why? Why might Elizabeth have chosen to remain single?
- Because there could not be a queen in a monarchy before a country without a king, it was necessary if or if (male chauvinism of the time). Moreover, Elizabeth decided not to marry anyone, because her greatest wish was to be committed to her country, to be loved and respected by its inhabitants/citizens; and to reign on the throne of England until the day she died.
