1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stella [2.4K]
3 years ago
8

How did Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the president during the Great Depression, use radio to help restore American confidence in t

heir government and the economy?
History
1 answer:
arsen [322]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you forgot to attach the options for this question we can answer the following.

Franklin D. Roosevelt, the president during the Great Depression, used radio to help restore American confidence in their government and the economy transmiting  messages as a way to keep the country informed.

When President Franklin D. Roosevelt took the office in 1933, the United States was living its worst economic crisis in history. The US stock market had crashed on October 29, 1929, marking the beginning of the Great Depression. Millions of Americans lost their jobs, banks declared bankruptcy, and thousands of companies broke.

Under these critical conditions, President Roosevelt wanted to directly communicate and inform the American people about the situation and his programs to offer solutions. These programs were the known as the New Deal, and through the use of the radio, he permanently informed the citizens about the advances.

You might be interested in
What affect did mechanization have on farming
MakcuM [25]
<span>It increased the speed of harvesting because mechanization helps get harvesting done quickly and efficiently.   
</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Explain how a factory owner would view capitalism
xenn [34]

Answer:

Economic theorizing

utilizes, on the one hand, mathematical techniques and, on the other, thought

experiments, parables, or stories. Progress may stagnate for various reasons.

Sometimes we are held back for lack of the technique needed to turn our stories

into the raw material for effective scientific work. At other times, we are

short of good stories to inject meaning into (and perhaps even to draw a moral

from) our models. One can strive for intellectual coherence in economics either

by attempting to fit all aspects of the subject into one overarching

mathematical structure or by trying to weave its best stories into one grand

epic.

This paper attempts to revive an old

parable, Adam Smith’s theory of manufacturing production, which has been

shunted aside and neglected because it has not fitted into the formal structure

of either neoclassical or neo-Ricardian theory. The paper attempts to persuade

not by formal demonstrations (at this stage) but by suggesting that the parable

can illuminate many and diverse problems and thus become the red thread in a

theoretical tapestry of almost epic proportions.

The subject may be approached from either

a theoretical or a historical angle. Regarding the theoretical starting-point,

it is possible to be brief since the familiar litany of complaints about the

neoclassical constant-returns production function hardly bears repeating. The

one point about it that is germane here is that it does not describe production

as a process, i.e., as an ordered sequence of operations. It is more like a

recipe for bouillabaisse where all the ingredients are dumped in a pot, (K, L),

heated up, f(·), and the output, X, is ready. This abstraction

from the sequencing of tasks, it will be suggested, is largely responsible for

the well-known fact that neoclassical production theory gives us no [204] clue

to how production is actually organized. Specifically, it does not help us

explain (1) why, since the industrial revolution, manufacturing is normally

conducted in factories with a sizeable workforce concentrated to one workplace,

or (2) why factories relatively seldom house more than one firm, or (3) why

manufacturing firms are “capitalistic” in the sense that capital

hires labor rather than vice versa.

5 0
2 years ago
Idk if you could help me but if you could please do:
KIM [24]

Answer:

animal poop & cows

Explanation:

bsjsos CH ejscsjsbssvss s jk s sbdc dd

8 0
3 years ago
Unlike W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington, Marcus Garvey
djyliett [7]

Answer:

Correct Answer is A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
When did the Siege of Stalingrad take place?
Rzqust [24]

Answer: Battle of Stalingrad Period is

August 23, 1942 – February 2, 1943

hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was not a pre-Aztec mesoamerican civilization a. the Inuit b. the olmecs c. the Toltecs d. the Maya
    15·1 answer
  • What happened to the Underground Railroad after the Fugitive Slave Act was passed?
    7·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to identify the physical features on the map. The area south of the Fertile Crescent is the . The body o
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the Battle of Shiloh have such an impact on America?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of Texas’ scientific leaders supported improvements in medicine and heart surgery?
    15·2 answers
  • Did the constitution help the farmers that were in debt from the American revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • Which activity was common to both the Dutch and the French settlers?
    8·1 answer
  • Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!! brainliest and 10 points
    10·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the document called A declaration of the United Nations?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!