Answer:
A
Explanation:
I would choose option A because it counters Cameron's claim, and then gives a reasonable explanation behind the counterclaim.
Mrs. Reed and Miss Temple are opposites - Reed is cruel and selfish; Temple is kind and nurturing
56 divided by 4 = 14 then 56-14= 42
42 of the apples are red.
Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
Bro thats so easy so do it yourself
