<span>Conquests gave empires more room to expand their cultures and peoples. It gave them more land to explore and more resources to find, which could then be used to fund future expeditions and conquests. The cycle continued as more land was picked up, more people were subjugated, and more resources were procured.</span>
The correct answer is C) Crudely-devised boundary lines have led to internal conflicts in countries.
Present-day societies have been affected by European imperialism in that "Crudely-devised boundary lines have led to internal conflicts in countries."
This is true in that European imperialistic ideas caused too much damage in the division of original territories due to political and economic interests during the African Scramble at the end of the 1800s, beginning of the 1900s.
During the so-called Scramble for Africa, European superpowers such as Great Britain, France, Portugal, and Germany, divided and modified the African territories in order to start the colonization. But what really wanted was to exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of the African territories.
Answer:
C. Neolithic era
Explanation:
crops were domesticated by Neolithic farming communities
The ruling determined that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional.
In doing so, the Supreme Court asserted that it has the right to declare laws of Congress unconstitutional.
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). But the bottom line was, the Court had taken up the right of judicial review by calling out a portion of the Judiciary Act of 1789 as unconstitutional.
Gas prices more than tripled
