What were 2 of the constitutional principles represented in his Birmingham jail letter?

History

1 answer:

11111nata11111 [884]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

condemning a robbed man because his possession of money precipitated the evil act of robbery

condemning Socrates because his unswerving commitment to truth and his philosophical inquiries precipitated the act by the misguided populace in which they made him drink hemlock

condemning Jesus because his unique God-consciousness and never-ceasing devotion to God's will precipitated the evil act of crucifixion

Explanation:

You might be interested in

In what kingdom do pharaohs provide for the public welfare

Mumz [18]

During the <u>Middle Kingdom</u> ( 2255-1650 B.C.E ) the Pharaohs began to work for the welfare of people. The whole Egypt was reunited under one rule and the period of Middle Kingdom is being called as golden age of Egypt because of economic, political and social stability of the period. Trade, arts and literature flourished during this period. The Pharaoh in the Middle Kingdom used to be "shepherd of his people" charged with the task of building public works and producing for the welfare of the Egyptians.

7 0

4 years ago

Help! checking answers

liq [111]

I think it's right. jdjdmdndn

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How was a city-state shaped by its citizenry?

Inessa [10]

Because the citizens would help make the city-states laws/ideas. City-states are independent from the actual country so they mkae there own laws.

3 0

3 years ago

Can someone help define these 9 terms:

ANTONII [103]

Answer:

Terry v ohio

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
investigative stop...A brief stop that is not intrusive. In order to conduct such a stop, a police officer must have reasonable suspicion that a crime been committed. This reasonable suspicion must be based on specific and articulable facts. criminal law and procedure.
Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard of proof in United States law that is less than probable cause, the legal standard for arrests and warrants, but more than an "inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or 'hunch'

Suspicious Activity Reports can cover almost any activity that is out of the ordinary.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why does the power to declare war belong only to the national government?

ira [324]

Because of the states had power to declare war it could lead to alot of issues

5 0

3 years ago