1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Butoxors [25]
3 years ago
13

1

History
1 answer:
OLga [1]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Crime and economics: a critical review of the economic explanations of crime

 

Luis David Ramírez de Garay *

 

* Doctor of Sociology with a specialty in Crime, Violence and Comparative Studies from Bielefeld University in Germany. He has a master's degree in political sociology at the Mora Institute and a degree in sociology from the Faculty of Political and Social Sciences of the UNAM. As of January 2013, he is a professor-researcher at the Center for Sociological Studies at the Colegio de México. Previously, he worked as a consultant for the United Nations and for the private sector in Mexico.

 

Resume

The link between crime and the economy is wide, full of edges and with interesting theoretical and empirical problems. For this reason, this article seeks to offer an overview of the scope and limits of this traditional nexus. For this, the explanations from sociology, economics and criminology were organized into three groups: criminal rationality, political economy of crime and economic deprivation. Each group was reviewed in the light of its origins, its basic arguments, its theoretical limits and its most relevant empirical problems; with special attention to the results that the investigation has had in the comparative study of crime. In conclusion, the text provides a clearer perspective on the status of economic explanations of crime;on the lines to follow to study the economic characteristics of crime; and an extensive Bibliography that will serve to guide future research.

Keywords : crime, economics, criminology, sociology of crime, political economy of crime, economic deprivation.

 

Abstract

The link between crime and the economy is wide and with appealing theoretical and empirical problems. In view of this the present paper offers a review of the advantages and the limits of this almost traditional link. For this purpose, different approaches from the sociology, the economy and the criminology were selected and classified into three groups: rationality, political economy and economic deprivation. The review of each group included its origins and its basic arguments so as its more important theoretical limits and empirical problems. To gain a better insight, the applicability of each approach to the comparative study of crime was also considered.As a result this text presents a wider and critical view of the actual status of the economic explanations of crime and an accurate map of the most important research puzzles related with the economic characteristics of crime. It also offers an extensive bibliography to guide students' interests and future research.

Key words : crime, economy, criminology, crime sociology, crime political economy, economic deprivation.

 

Introduction

A review of the relationship between the economy and crime

The interest in explaining crime based on economic conditions has been present for a long time in the history of social thought. In the 19th century, before the appearance of the social sciences, a proto-meaning of the relationship between economic phenomena with the emergence of the concept of deviant behavior can already be found. Deviance or abnormal behavior appeared as social problems alongside the industrialization processes of western Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries. The abrupt changes in the social structure and economic production were accompanied by the rapid growth of urban centers, the emergence of urban crime, and the growth of the so-called new “dangerous classes”.These suboptimal products of industrialization quickly became the object of study of the social thought of the time, thus becoming the first link between economic processes and criminality.

Towards the end of the 19th century, this link was already occupying an important place on the agenda of an incipient but modern social science. In

You might be interested in
Which city-state granted citizenship to women<br>​
valkas [14]

Answer:

SPARTA

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Describe the significance of Grant’s meeting Lee at the Appomattox Courthouse. please
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

HE GENTLEMEN'S AGREEMENT

See "The Surrender" painting by Keith Rocco

On the morning of April 9, while General Robert E . Lee realized that the retreat of his beleaguered army had finally been halted, U. S. Grant was riding toward Appomattox Court House where Union Cavalry, followed by infantry from the V, XXIV, and XXV Corps had blocked the Confederate path. Lee had sent a letter to Grant requesting a meeting to discuss his army's surrender and this letter overtook Grant and his party just before noon about four miles west of Walker's Church (present-day Hixburg). Grant, who had been suffering from a severe headache, later remembered that upon reading Lee's letter the pain in his head had disappeared. He stopped to prepare his reply to Lee, writing that he would push to the front to meet him.

The location of the meeting was left to Lee's discretion. Lt. Colonel Orville E . Babcock and his orderly, Capt. Dunn, took Grant's reply and rode ahead. Babcock found Lee resting under an apple tree near the Appomattox River. After reading Grant's letter, Lee, his Aide-de-Camp Lt. Colonel Charles Marshall, and Private Joshua O. Johns rode toward Appomattox Court House accompanied by Federal Officers Lt. Col. Babcock and Capt. William McKee Dunn. Marshall and Johns rode ahead of Lee in order to find a place for the generals to confer. As Marshall passed through the village he saw Wilmer McLean in the vicinity of the courthouse. He asked McLean if he knew of a suitable location, and McLean took him to an empty structure that was without furniture. Marshall immediately rejected this offer. Then McLean offered his own home. After seeing the comfortable country abode, Marshall readily accepted and sent Private Johns back to inform General Lee that a meeting site had been found.

Lee arrived at the McLean house about one o'clock and took a seat in the parlor. A half hour later, the sound of horses on the stage road signalled the approach of General Grant. Entering the house, Grant greeted Lee in the center of the room. The generals presented a contrasting appearance; Lee in a new uniform and Grant in his mud-spattered field uniform. Grant, who remembered meeting Lee once during the Mexican War, asked the Confederate general if he recalled their meeting. Lee replied that he did, and the two conversed in a very cordial manner, for approximately 25 minutes. The subject had not yet gotten around to surrender until finally, Lee, feeling the anguish of defeat, brought Grant's attention to it. Grant, who later confessed to being embarrassed at having to ask for the surrender from Lee, said simply that the terms would be just as he had outlined them in a previous letter.

The terms would parole officers and enlisted men but required that all Confederate military equipment be relinquished. The discussion between the generals then drifted into the prospects for peace, but Lee, once again taking the lead, asked Grant to put his terms in writing. When Grant finished, he handed the terms to his former adversary, and Lee -- first donning spectacles used for reading-- quietly looked them over. When he finished reading, the bespectacled Lee looked up at Grant and remarked "This will have a very happy effect on my army." Lee asked if the terms allowed his men to keep their horses, for in the Confederate army men owned their mounts. Lee explained that his men would need these animals to farm once they returned to civilian life. Grant responded that he would not change the terms as written (which had no provisions allowing private soldiers to keep their mounts) but would order his officers to allow any Confederate claiming a horse or a mule to keep it. General Lee agreed that this concession would go a long way toward promoting healing. Grant's generosity extended further. When Lee mentioned that his men had been without rations for several days, the Union commander arranged for 25, 000 rations to be sent to the hungry Confederates. After formal copies of the surrender terms, and Lee's acceptance, had been drafted and exchanged, the meeting ended.

In a war that was marked by such divisiveness and bitter fighting, it is remarkable that it ended so simply. Grant's compassion and generosity did much to allay the emotions of the Confederate troops. As for Robert E. Lee, he realized that the best course was for his men to return home and resume their lives as American citizens.

Before he met with General Grant, one of Lee's officers (General E. Porter Alexander) had suggested fighting a guerilla war, but Lee had rejected the idea. It would only cause more pain and suffering for a cause that was lost. The character of both Lee and Grant was of such a high order that the surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia has been called "The Gentlemen's Agreement."

7 0
3 years ago
Enter the word you received when you completed the comparing sparta
Luden [163]

Answer:

if the last word to that sentence was Athens then the answer is Democracy

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Beside George Washington which other General stayed with the continental army in the winter of 1778 at Valley Forge?
Anni [7]

Answer:

General Henry Knox

Explanation:

I think

7 0
3 years ago
In what ways does education provide freedom for people?
alexdok [17]
Education allows people to form their own ideas.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the name of the philosopher that used in his thoughts a maieulics method
    10·1 answer
  • A direct result of Rosa Park’s refusal to give up her seat on a Montgomery bus in 1955 was
    12·2 answers
  • Will Mark Brainlist!
    5·2 answers
  • A key develpoment that occured globally during the classical era was
    9·1 answer
  • Can you tell me who is Clay Marzo??
    15·2 answers
  • Question 19
    9·1 answer
  • Match the following. Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column.
    13·2 answers
  • Who writed Morometii?​
    14·2 answers
  • Read Philippians 2:6-11. What are three things that this poem tells us about Jesus?
    8·1 answer
  • What was an advantage for the colonists during the American Revolutionary War?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!