<em><u>General William T. Sherman's "March to the Sea" was important to the Union war effort because important railroad tracks were destroyed, severing supply lines for Confederate forces.
</u></em>
<u>Further Explanation:-
</u>
Between the period of November 15 to December 21 in the year 1864, Union general William T. Sherman led around 60,000 soldiers to a march which was 285 miles long which begun from Atlanta and ended in Savannah in Georgia. The idea behind this march was to frighten the population of Georgia as they wanted people of Georgia to abandon the confederate cause. The soldiers from Sherman’s army did not destroy any of the towns which came in their way to Georgia but instead, they stole food as well as livestock of the people and burned their houses and also killed people who tried to fight back. The military which was led by German Sherman captured Atlanta and that was considered an important win for their movement as during that period of time Atlanta was considered as a Railroad hub along with that it was known as an industrial center. Sherman believed that the railroads of Atlanta provided material and support to the Confederate troops and in order to stop this supply his army destroyed railroad lines.
Learn More
1. how does a writ of habeas corpus safeguard individual freedom?<u>brainly.com/question/1753300
</u>
2. why was roe v. wade a controversial case?<u>brainly.com/question/305020
</u>
3. which of the following events occurred on the Italian mainland as allied forces moved across the island of Sicily during the summer of 1943?<u>brainly.com/question/1752727
</u>
Answer Details
Grade – High School
Subject – History
Chapter – March to Sea
<u>Keywords </u>– March to Sea, General, William T. Sherman, Confederate troops, Railroads, Georgia, Livestock, Food Supplies, Atlanta, Killings.
Hueganots
hope this helped
Accessibility refers to things that help people with disibilities. ex. A wheelchair.
The attitude that arose as a result of this was b - the blame was placed on the union and striking workers.
<h3>What was the Haymarket Riot?</h3>
- It was a labor protest against poor working conditions.
- Eight people died as a result.
While the protest was going on, a bomb was thrown at the police. The police then responded by shooting indiscriminately which led to the deaths of around 8 people. They then blamed the labor unions and protesters.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on the Haymarket Riot at brainly.com/question/1831737.
Maybe this will help u
Providing for the welfare of the general public<span> is a basic goal of government. The preamble to the U.S. Constitution cites promotion of the general welfare as a primary reason for the creation of the Constitution. Promotion of </span><span>the general welfare is also a stated purpose in state constitutions and statutes</span>. The concept sparked controversy only as a result of its inclusion in the body of the U.S. Constitution.
The first clause of Article I, Section 8, reads, "The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare States." This clause, called the General Welfare Clause or the Spending Power Clause, does not grant Congress the power to legislate for the general welfare of the country; that is a power reserved to the through the Tenth Amendment. Rather, it merely allows Congress to spend federal money for the general welfare. The principle underlying this distinction -- the limitation of federal power -- eventually inspired important disagreement over the meaning of the clause.
According to James Madison, the clause authorized Congress to spend money, but only to carry out and duties specifically enumerated in the subsequent clauses of Article I, Section 8, and elsewhere Constitution, not to meet the seemingly infinite needs of the general welfare. Alexander Hamilton maintained the clause <span>granted Congress the power to spend without limitation</span> for the general welfare of the nation. The winner of this debate was not declared for 150 years.
In United States v. Butler, 56 S. Ct. 312, 297 U.S. 1, 80 L. Ed. 477 (1936), the U.S. Supreme Court federal agricultural spending program because a specific congressional power over agricultural production appeared nowhere in the Constitution. According to the Court in Butler, <span>the spending program invaded a right reserved to the states</span> by the Tenth Amendment.