The main difference is that the article suggests the murder was likely committed by robbers, while the excerpt suggests a wider range of suspects.
<h3>How can this difference be noticed?</h3>
- Through the reading of texts.
- By identifying the characterization of the killer.
- By comparing the diction between the texts.
- Through the purpose of each text.
With the reading of both texts, it is possible to see that the article tends to present the murder in a more objective and specific way, while the excerpt wants to show that the murder was more complex and with layers of difficult determination.
More information about diction at the link:
brainly.com/question/14571737
I believe the answer is A, better scholarships
I am not 100% sure, though!
Answer: Potato chips
Explanation:
The claim was that some inventions are not planned and potato chips were invented on accident meaning they weren’t planned
Answer:
The sentence that has a gerund is:
B. Chewing the heels off all of my nice shoes is Stinker's favorite thing to do.
Explanation:
A gerund is a form that is derived from a verb. However, it functions as a noun. It is formed by adding -ing to the root of the verb. For example: dance - dancing; eat - eating; study - studying.
Among the options, the one that has a gerund is letter B. "Chewing the heels off all of my nice shoes is Stinker's favorite thing to do." The gerund "chewing" functions as a noun. In this sentence, more specifically, it functions as the subject.
