1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Papessa [141]
3 years ago
13

Why might appointing supporters as a reward, instead of based on merit, detrimental to governing?

History
1 answer:
kotykmax [81]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It will surely be detrimental to governing.

Explanation:

A supported who is appointed as a reward might not have the qualities needed like that of someone appointed based on merit thereby causing problems.

You might be interested in
Which statements about slavery in the Muslim world are correct?
Mila [183]

Answer:

-Most slaves were women who worked not in fields but as household slaves.

-Slave traders marched slaves for sixty or seventy days across the Sahara.

-Slavery had been practiced in Muslim societies since the founding of Islam in the 600s.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What conclusion can be drawn regarding communication methods?
Ierofanga [76]
Communication may break down as a result of many communication barriers that may be attributed to the sender or receiver. Therefore, effective communication requires familiarity with the barriers. Choosing the right channel for communication is also important, because choosing the wrong medium undermines the message.
7 0
3 years ago
Why was industrialization the center of all change in America?
tigry1 [53]
World War I (1914–18): Causes Although the United States<span> did not enter World War I until 1917, the outbreak of that war in 1914, and its underlying causes and consequences, deeply and immediately affected America's position both at home and abroad. In the debate on </span>neutrality<span> and later on peace aims, much was made of European secret diplomacy, which was rejected on the U.S. side of the Atlantic, of militarism and the escalating arms race before 1914, and of the impact of colonialism. Undoubtedly, all these factors contributed to the origins of the European catastrophe, but they do not explain why the war broke out when it did. This question can only be answered more precisely by looking at the political and military decision‐making processes in the last months, weeks, and days of peace in 1914.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
According to the establishment clause, how would society's posting of the ten commandments along with the history of religion an
agasfer [191]

i need answer choices

7 0
3 years ago
Women during the gilded age
zmey [24]
Not fully understanding your question but You could look up information on that subjct
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In which year did the battle of gettysburg occur?
    11·1 answer
  • Why would Congress not seat newly elected senators and representatives from southern states?
    11·1 answer
  • In what way did the new Japanese constitution change the role of the emperor?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the political party of most of the African Americans elected to public office during reconstruction
    11·2 answers
  • Civil rights and equality have played a major role in American history. People have been fighting for rights based on gender, et
    12·2 answers
  • After rome had twice defeated carthage, why was the third punic war fought?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the name of the treaty that is designed to limit the spread of nuclear weapons and that has been signed by 190 countries
    15·2 answers
  • Write a paragraph about the New Deal and how it might have helped.
    14·1 answer
  • Main ideas of the Renaissance
    8·1 answer
  • What is Allen's stance on people who burn the<br> American flag?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!