Answer:
Death is coming for sure. The vicar has not heard the owl yet, but he is very ill and does not know it.
Explanation:
when the owl calls your name, you are soon to die
Answer:
The Little Match Girl is the fairy tale
Commons
“How did Faulkner pull it off?” is a question many a fledgling writer has asked themselves while struggling through a period of apprenticeship like that novelist John Barth describes in his 1999 talk "My Faulkner." Barth “reorchestrated” his literary heroes, he says, “in search of my writerly self... downloading my innumerable predecessors as only an insatiable green apprentice can.” Surely a great many writers can relate when Barth says, “it was Faulkner at his most involuted and incantatory who most enchanted me.” For many a writer, the Faulknerian sentence is an irresistible labyrinth. His syntax has a way of weaving itself into the unconscious, emerging as fair to middling imitation.
While studying at Johns Hopkins University, Barth found himself writing about his native Eastern Shore Maryland in a pastiche style of “middle Faulkner and late Joyce.” He may have won some praise from a visiting young William Styron, “but the finished opus didn’t fly—for one thing, because Faulkner intimately knew his Snopses and Compsons and Sartorises, as I did not know my made-up denizens of the Maryland marsh.” The advice to write only what you know may not be worth much as a universal commandment. But studying the way that Faulkner wrote when he turned to the subjects he knew best provides an object lesson on how powerful a literary resource intimacy can be
Answer:
"widely"
Explanation:
Hi there,
An easy way to identify most adverbs is to see whether the word ends with
"-ly". The adverb for this sentence is the word "widely".
Cheers.
Answer:
The election determined whether or not Eckels remained rich in the future.
Explanation:
In the first instance where the election is mentioned, Eckels states very delightedly gives thanks God that Keith won the race for the seat of the President Of The United States. Eckels states that if Keith had lost, he would have been trying to get away from the consequences of the same.
In the next instance, Eckels back from a time travel trip realizes that Keith lost the election and puts the gun to this head and "click".
According to the story, he a very rich businessman had taken to time travel as a hobby, going off into the past to shoot game.
There were certain rules that guided this endeavor. One of them was that he must not kill that he wasn't allowed or permitted to kill. Anything considered as a major disturbance to the past would affect events in the future.
Eckels somehow kills a butterfly and that results in the shift in the results of the elections by the time he gets back to the present.
Cheers