That sounds really demanding. You know, a lot of responsibilities.
"A. Two-thirds of the team attended practice" is the only sentence that is written correctly since in this case fractions should be hyphenated, although this is slipping from convention.
Answer:
C. the claim regarding whether the strategies used are effective
Explanation:
An introduction must present a brief summary of what the text will discuss, that is, the introduction must present the content of the text to the reader. Although the introduction above presented the main object of the rhetorical analysis essay, it made no mention of the conclusions that this text presented, that is, the introduction showed the strategies used by teachers to improve their career plans, but it did not show which these strategies were effective.
Answer:
Theme...
Explanation:
I believe the theme, is that no matter what people think, you have nothing to fear or worry about, because everyone is different, and all have different back stories
Answer:
The soldier is pointing out that:
a) It is often conflicting.
Explanation:
If people who are fighting against you open fire and kill you, we can say you were killed by enemy fire, since it was the enemy who shot. Thus, friendly fire means being killed by your friends, not by your enemy. However, <u>when the soldier says, "I don't know why they call it friendly fire if it kills you," he is paying more attention to the literal meaning of "friendly". "Friendly" can refer to people who are nice and kind. But it can also refer to something that is not harmful. If a product does not harm nature, we say it is environment-friendly. From this perspective, it does seem weird to call "friendly fire" something that is harmful, that can kill you. Thus, to this soldier, terminology used at war seems conflicting.</u>
