1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
3 years ago
15

How did the Roman Catholic Church respond to the

History
1 answer:
statuscvo [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

At first the Catholic Church reverted to the historic practices of banning and excommunication, followed by military repression. When these methods failed to stop the spread of Protestantism the Catholic Church turned to the Counter Reformation.As Protestantism swept across many parts of Europe, the Catholic Church reacted by making limited reforms, curbing earlier abuses, and combating the further spread of Protestantism. This movement is known as the Catholic Counter-Reformation.What were the three key elements of the Catholic Reformation, and why were they so important to the Catholic Church in the 17th century? The founding of the Jesuits, reform of the papacy, and the Council of Trent. They were important because they unified the church, help spread the gospel, and validated the church.

Explanation:

HOPE THAT HELPS!!!!

You might be interested in
Why do you think the eastern half of the empire survived
KiRa [710]

Answer: Because of the organization and capable leadership of the empire.

Explanation:

Byzantium did not survive by "mere luck." Byzantium has maintained thanks to capable leaders, an organization, skilled diplomats and an excellent military organization. True, he did not possess "that splendour" as the Western Roman Empire at its height, but it is wrong to think that thanks to luck, the empire was maintained for almost a thousand years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The great French Byzantologist and historian Charles Diehl says<em> "The Byzantine Empire was a captive of Christianity in the east, against the unbelievers it saved Europe in a few moments by its inferiority, in the Middle Ages ".</em>

5 0
3 years ago
How is the Electoral College a form of indirect democracy?
Vesnalui [34]

it makes us a representative democracy

in a full democracy every single person must vote on everything so having the Electoral college represents the people

4 0
3 years ago
How and why do Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims differ?
Kitty [74]

Answer:

The main difference is their view on who Muhammad's successor should/should've been.

The people that believed that anyone with the right qualifications could take over insisted that Muhammad's father in law and friend, Abu Bakr, success him and became known as the Sunni.

The people who insisted that only someone blood related to Muhammad could take over, they wanted Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law, Ali ibn Abi Talib, to take over; and they became known as the Shi'ite.

They both follow the foundational practices and beliefs (Fice Pillars) of Islam though there are differences in the way they do some things and their views on the world. For example: Shi'ite Muslims complete all five daily ritual prayers but squeeze them into three sessions instead of five. Shi'ite Muslims also believe in the 'ten obligatory acts' in addition to the Five Pillars.

Hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
General scotts plan to defeat the confederacy was known as the plan
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

The Anaconda Plan

Explanation:

The Anaconda Plan was the Union's strategic plan to defeat the Confederacy at the start of the American Civil War. The goal was to defeat the rebellion by blockading southern ports and controlling the Mississippi river.

4 0
3 years ago
What are the arguments that agree (i.e., support), and disagree (i.e., against) with the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that r
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

There is no short answer.

Explanation:

  The mentioned decision was about whether the corporations and unions can or can not contribute financially to the campaigns of the politicians they want to support as long as the corporations themselves are independent of the campaigns.

  One of the strongest disagreements to this was that this action was going to allow the corporations to flood selected politicians' campaigns with money, maybe corporations outside of US.

  One of the arguments that agree with the decision was that the corporations also have a right of free speech including supporting their chosen political candidates even though corporations are not individual people.

I hope this answer helps.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the most likely reason that the constitution placed limits on the president's power to convene and dismiss congress
    13·1 answer
  • How technological innovation has affected society
    15·1 answer
  • How does Odysseus's crew keep from succumbing to the sirens
    9·2 answers
  • The most powerful man in Europe was...
    14·2 answers
  • In the outcome of the opium war what did treaties do
    15·1 answer
  • What is the definition Roman republic?
    7·2 answers
  • The name of the peaceful, beautiful queen who ruled Egypt from 1473-1458 BC and expanded trade with other countries. *
    12·1 answer
  • Subjects in Titchener's laboratory were asked to swallow a stomach tube record their sensations and feelings during urination an
    5·1 answer
  • The Burmese and Thai originally came from, respectively,
    15·1 answer
  • 7.1c
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!