1. True. It depends on how the monarchy uses his or her power
2. False. A dictatorship is a type of rule that demands its citizens to listen to all of its rules.
3. True. If it follows the correct way of business and listens to its citizens.
4. False. An oligarchy is sort of like a monarchy. It only includes a few people making all of the decisions, which are usually the few rich individuals.
5. True. A government can be a monarchy and cause its citizens to reject and attempt to overthrow its government.
6. True.
7. True.
8. True. If it makes a rich person the only ruler, then it could be an oligharchy
Because eventually it could give people new ideas.
Increase arable land for farming.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
D) the steady, clocklike decay of certain radioactive isotopes over time.
Explanation:
Geologists use radiometric dating to estimate how long ago rocks formed, and to infer the ages of fossils contained within those rocks.
For example, when rocks are formed, such as igneous rocks (formed when molten rocks cools), certain radioactive atoms are trapped inside the rocks during this formation process. Then these radioactive atoms decay over time.
The age of the rock can be estimated by comparing the occurring radioactive isotope within the material to the abundance of its decay products, which form at a known constant rate of decay.
From the options;
A) this is about the formation of the radioactive molecules and not about radiometric dating
B) this is radiocarbon dating (cabon dating/carbon-14 dating)
C) the <em>assumption </em>is wrong since the radioactive isotopes decays not accumulate.
D) the corect option as I explained earlier.
The worldwide cataclysmic flood in the days of Noah caused the continents to move into the places we find them today. Earth has been affected by sudden, short-lived, violent events that were sometimes worldwide in scope.
This is called Catastrophism and it states that the Earth has been affected by sudden, short-lived, violent events that were sometimes worldwide. Creationists always opt for the catastrophic explanation and more often than not, this is the dynamic that best explains what we see in nature.
Creationstudies.org