Scots-Irish migrants increasingly opposed quaker policy in the 1740s because they: c. opposed the colony's pacifism toward Native Americans.
Many Americans of Celtic descent additionally mistakenly agree with their Irish whilst in truth, they may be Scots-Irish. Scots-Irish Americans are descendants of Scots who lived in Northern Ireland for two or 3 generations however retained their Scottish individual and Protestant faith.
Scotch-Irish or Scots-Irish may additionally talk over with: Ulster-Scots people, an ethnic institution in Ulster, eire, who trace their roots to settlers from Scotland. Scotch-Irish people, descendants of Ulster Scots who first migrated to the USA in huge numbers in the 18th and nineteenth centuries.
The Scots had been Presbyterians and the English Anglicans with a few dissenting creeds. consequently, we've got the Scotch-Irish who later have been to be one of these big elements in settling the new international.
Learn more about Scots-Irish here:
brainly.com/question/24669938
#SPJ4
Disclaimer: your question is incomplete please see below for the complete question
a. wanted laws that respected their inheritance customs.
b. wanted greater representation in the colonial assembly.
c. opposed the colony's pacifism toward Native Americans.
d. opposed Quaker's attempts to enforce moral behavior.
A). <u>Universal rights</u>,
B). <u>Laws of nature</u>,
C). <u>A constitutional monarch</u><u>.</u>
<h3>What did " The Sweets of Liberty" made of?</h3>
The "Sweets of Liberty" is a part of the 'British School II' album, which consists approximately 170 prints and was published between 1713 and 1810.
In the book, the author described the origins of the Royal Academy and role played by Academicians in the development of British art.
The whole album is organized with the events in chronological order.
Learn more about the Universal rights here:-
brainly.com/question/13253985
#SPJ1
WAS it still is a good show
Hello!
Option 1: "The government cannot be run by a religious group." This is true! The government cannot be run by a religious group, specifically due to religious freedom in the US. If this were allowed, American citizens who believe in different religions would begin to lose their freedom because the government would be based around a specific religion.
Option 2: "The government cannot stop people from practicing their religion." This is true! Freedom of religion is outlined in the First Amendment of the US Constitution. This means that the government cannot interfere with a person's religious beliefs, and all people have the freedom to practice any religion.
Option 3: "The government cannot make laws that religious organizations have to follow." This is false! Laws are passed for specific reasons and must be followed by all people, regardless of religion. Society must follow laws in order for them to remain effective.
Option 4: "The government cannot create a national religion." This is true! All American citizens have the right to practice any religion they choose. The government cannot create a national religion that all people need to practice.
Option 5: "The government cannot use the word "God" in any official documents or other works." This is false! The government can use the word "God" in official documents. For example, the Pledge of Allegiance (commonly recited): "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
I hope this helps you! Feel free to comment or PM me if you have any additional questions. Have a great day!
<span>The reason that the heliocentric model of the universe that are developed by both Galileo and Copernicus has been considered to be a heresy during their lives was because that there has been a conflict in regards with the official doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. The correct answer is letter d.</span>
