Answer:
Judicial review
Explanation:
The Supreme Court has a power called "judicial review". What this means is that the Supreme Court can take a law and interpret it. They can decide whether a law violates the Constitution or not. And if it is indeed unconstitutional, they can strike that law down.
Answer:
Popular sovereignty is equal to political equality among citizens, is the right answer.
Explanation:
John Locke is the most prominent political thinkers of modern times. He published the book name "Two Treatises of Government" in the year 1690. In this book, he supported a claimed that men are naturally born free and equal and gave more importance to natural rights. In the social contract theory, developed during the Age of Enlightenment, the idea of popular sovereignty was put forward by John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In this theory of popular sovereignty, the legitimacy of the law is based on the acquiescence of the governed. According to the thinkers, when people choose to live in a society they give up some of their natural freedoms in return of the protection from threats that come from the freedom of others.
Therefore, it may be said that Locke emphasized on the pair of popular sovereignty and political equality.
Absolute monarchy is a system where the monarch, which is chosen based on the dynasty of the current family in power, has complete and total control. In other words, their power is absolute, hence the name.
From the moment the first plane hit the North Tower, the immigration system in the United States was destined to change.
The attacks on September 11, 2001 certainly didn't start the country's immigration debate, but it did alter the course of the discussion.
Immigration was already a staple of the nightly news through the 1990s into the 2000s. After a series of free trade agreements realigned economies in Mexico and Central America, millions of migrants headed to northern Mexico and the U.S. looking for work.
"After 9/11, the Bush administration tried to see immigration enforcement as a way to fight terrorism," Burnham said. "And it's just not."
so the answer D
True.
<span>These colonies did become separate. They were both claimed by different countries and groups of people from the start.</span>
