1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
koban [17]
3 years ago
10

Need helpp fastt plss will give brainliest to who is correct plss helpp

English
2 answers:
nadezda [96]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

yea it's C

Explanation:

matrenka [14]3 years ago
4 0
The answer is C i think
You might be interested in
Plzz help asap plz
erastovalidia [21]
To
follow him and his word, because it’s known that he is the path we shall follow, his way is the only path to the promised kingdom if we follow
4 0
3 years ago
In your own personal life how will you make yourself secure in the future explain your answer​
djyliett [7]

Answer:

Writing things down

Explanation:

It always gives me a better boost on what to do in the future.

6 0
2 years ago
Out of 4,000 colleges surveyed, 60% reported that SAT scores were not used as a high consideration in viewing their applications
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

1600

Explanation:

To 60 percent for schools, s a t is not important.

subtract 60 from 100 which gives us 40 percent

concert 40 percent into a decimal which is .40

multiply 4000 by .49

7 0
3 years ago
What is the cultural background of the protagonist in condensed milk
yulyashka [42]

In "Condensed Milk," nothing is mentioned about the protagonist's cultural upbringing. There was no justification for us politicals to be there, he says, referring to himself and other convicts as "politicals." This most likely indicates that the main character is a well-educated individual who may be a writer or journalist whose opinions and output were seen negatively by the Russian government. A backdrop like this aids the protagonist in comprehending how the camp actually functions. He is aware that the invitation to flee is a trick. He is clever and sly enough to cut off the agreement after obtaining some condensed milk. He makes advantage of his knowledge to extend his life a little. The short tale "Condensed Milk" was written by Varlam Shalamov in Russia (1907-1982). Based on the author's experiences as a prisoner in a Gulag, or forced labor camp, it was written. The protagonist's identity and background are kept a secret. For instance, he is not a member of the same organization as the thieves. His arrest for "political" activity raises questions about his history. He is most likely well-educated, which makes it possible for the government to view him as a danger because he has the freedom to voice his own thoughts. In summary, the "Condensed Milk" protagonist uses his knowledge and intelligence to stay alive.

3 0
2 years ago
If the President of the United States were accused of accepting bribes while in office what power does Congress have to bring ch
Y_Kistochka [10]

The United States Constitution provides that the House of Representatives "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment" ( Article I, section 2 ) and that "the Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments…[but] no person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present" ( Article I, section 3 ). The president, vice president, and all civil officers of the United States are subject to impeachment.

The concept of impeachment originated in England and was adopted by many of the American colonial governments and state constitutions. As adopted by the framers, this congressional power is a fundamental component of the constitutional system of “checks and balances.” Through the impeachment process, Congress charges and then tries an official of the federal government for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The definition of “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” was not specified in the Constitution and has long been subject to debate.

In impeachment proceedings, the House of Representatives charges an official of the federal government by approving, by majority vote, articles of impeachment. A committee of representatives, called “managers,” acts as prosecutors before the Senate. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. In the case of presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from holding public offices in the future. There is no appeal. Since 1789, about half of Senate impeachment trials have resulted in conviction and removal from office.

Historical Development

In The Federalist , No. 65, Alexander Hamilton wrote that impeachment is "a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men" accused of violating the “public trust.” Hamilton and his colleagues at the Constitutional Convention knew that the history of impeachment as a constitutional process dated from 14th-century England, when the fledgling Parliament sought to make the king's advisers accountable. By the mid-15th century, impeachment had fallen into disuse in England, but in the early 17th century, the excesses of the English kings prompted Parliament to revive its impeachment power. Even as the Constitution's framers toiled in Philadelphia in 1787, the impeachment trial of British official Warren Hastings was in progress in London and avidly followed in America. Hastings, who was eventually acquitted, was charged with oppression, bribery, and fraud as colonial administrator and first governor-general in India

The American colonial governments and early state constitutions followed the British pattern of trial before the upper legislative body on charges brought by the lower house. Despite these precedents, a major controversy arose at the Constitutional Convention about whether the Senate should act as the court of impeachment. Opposing that role for the Senate, James Madison and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney asserted that it would make the president too dependent on the legislative branch. They suggested, as alternative trial bodies, the Supreme Court or the chief justices of the state supreme courts. Hamilton and others argued, however, that such bodies would be too small and susceptible to corruption. In the end, after much wrangling, the framers selected the Senate as the trial forum. To Hamilton fell the task of explaining the convention's decision. In The Federalist , No. 65, he argued:

The Convention thought the Senate the most fit depository of this important trust. Where else than in the Senate could have been found a tribunal sufficiently dignified, or sufficiently independent? What other body would be likely to feel confidence enough in its own situation, to preserve unawed and uninfluenced the necessary impartiality between an individual accused, and the representatives of the people, his accusers?

There was also considerable debate at the convention in Philadelphia over the definition of impeachable crimes. In the early proposals, the president and other officials could be removed on impeachment and conviction for "corrupt conduct," or for "malpractice or neglect of duty." Later, the wording was changed to "treason, bribery, or corruption," and then to "treason or bribery" alone. Contending that "treason or bribery" was too narrow a definition, George Mason proposed adding "mal-administration" but switched to "other high crimes and misdemeanors against the state" when Madison commented that "mal-administration" was too broad. A final revision defined impeachable offenses as "treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What inspires warriors to make a such personal sacrifices?
    9·1 answer
  • When it comes, the landscape listens,
    7·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP. WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Select all of the sentences that do not have a double negative. We haven't been to no ball games in over a month. We have been t
    11·2 answers
  • Hi, does anyone know anything about a book thats called, Flowers for Algernon? (15 pts)
    11·2 answers
  • Use context to identify of the words underlined poem
    12·1 answer
  • What are the disadvantages of fire
    9·1 answer
  • is it true that in to kill a mockingbird, Mr. Underwood likened Tom Robinson’s killing to the senseless slaughter of songbirds b
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement is true of an antagonist of a character vs. nature conflict?
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement describes the writers purpose
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!