Answer:
Plato believed that the aristocracy would allow only people with the right intellect to rule the country efficiently. He believed that aristocracy was the combination of wisdom and virtue and that this is reserved for only a limited number of noble citizens who have full access to the highest quality education.
Explanation:
The aristocracy is a way of establishing a national government through specific people in society who would have all the power of governance in a country. These people would be chosen through noble lineage and wealth.
Aristoteles and Plato were great supporters of these systems, as they believed that only people with full access to quality education would have sufficient ethical and moral intellect to be a head of government. Only nobles had this access.
These philosophers believed that the aristocracy was much better than democracy, because democracy gave freedom to anyone to stand for political office, in addition to allowing people who had no access to education and therefore a "low intellect" to choose those who would represent the government.
Although today, some people believe that the aristocracy is a good form of government, we know that it is not right to believe that. This is because keeping a country's governance power in the hands of a single family, where the post of head of state is chosen through a lineage is very dangerous.
Democracy allows us to remove tyrannical and inefficient leaders from power and choose that candidate who represents ideas that will benefit the country and lead its people to advance.
Answer: B.conformity
Explanation:
Conformity is when a person changes his/her belief to match that of a group of people which may be the person's peers but have no right to dictate his/her behavior.
Labeling is the act of applying a social description to a person or a group of people and may define a person’s status in a society.
Deviance: to go against what is seen a normal or acceptable by a group of people
.
Obedience: is to submit to the laws of an authority, such as the government.
What exactly is the question? Comment and tell me it.
Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. If the third party has a candidate promising similar things to the Rep. candidate, the Democrats are more likely to win simply because their votes are not being siphoned off. Think of it this way: if a school class were to vote on favorite colors and there were only blue and red to choose from, it would probably be mostly equal. But if the same class were to vote for blue, teal, and red, I would be willing to bet that red would win just because its votes weren't being split like the blue votes were. Teal is the third party. It won't ever win on its own, but it can be influential in that it can help the opposite party win.
