A. They both served their masters for life. I think
Answer:
There are advantages as well as disadvantages of a partnership.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Advantages (pros): <em>Partnership helps in establishing the organisation and in capital investments. </em>Having two or more heads is better than having one head to look after the organisation. <em>In partnership has an opportunity for dividing the income this results in tax savings.
</em>
Disadvantages (Cons): <em>If the partners join or leave the organisation this can be costly and must be bared by you</em>. Liability will be the topmost issue found in partnership, in sharing profits and assets. The owner is responsible to bear all the loss occurred. <em>We should share all the details of the organisation and none of the detail is to be hidden.</em>
Part of the debate over rights in the 18th century involved the prerogative of kings to remove and appoint judges upon their ascension to the throne. Liberal thinkers believed that lifetime appointments would scale back the power of the king, and therefore represented social progress. If a judge was sure of his seat, he could vote according to his own judgment, despite the wishes of the king. The Whigs in Britain actually won this right, though whether it really served their cause or their government is anyone's guess.
The president is commander in chief and has the power to control the military. This allows him to enact martial law which can be used on our own soil to put down rebellions and threats to our public peace as well as our institution.
Basically my best bet is martial law.
The Second Punic war started with Hannibal, a Carthage general, surprise attacking the Romans and defeating many armies in the beginning, but at the end, the Romans still won
hope this helps
