Clandestine graves are of interest to forensic taphonomy because criminals try to hide evidence of their acts.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- The work of clandestine graves is to do forensic investigations. There will be many forensic investigation cases. Criminals try to escape from those investigations.
- So clandestine graves have many interests in investigating the forensic taphonomy. After investigating the event the witness should match the case of the incident. Using particular information the clandestine graves should investigate the incident. They have to make criminals tell the truth of the incident.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
