Answer: The monster challenges readers to recognize that a monster could be an ordinary person, not just an outcast.
Explanation:
The last one (according to….)
Answer:
1. Look at those black clouds. It will rain.
2. I felt terrible. I think I am going to be sick.
3. Tom will probably get here at about 8 o’clock.
4. I think Sarah will like the present we bought for her.
5. We are going to visit my grandparents this evening.
6. “Gary phoned you while you were out”. “OK , I will call him back.
7. This cheese looks horrible. I am not going to eat it.
8. Tom will not pass the exam. He hasn’t studied hard enough.
9. “Are you going out this morning?” “No, I will tidy my room.
10. Are you going to watch television this evening?
Explanation:
First of all, if the story would be in chronological order, there would be no story at all. This is because the main character of the story, Anna, won't tell the narrator, her daughter, a lot about her past. "She has kept no squinted costume, no photographs, no fliers or posters from that part of her youth".
Because the narrator tells the story in the present and uses flashbacks is the reason that she can unify certain themes, such as the three times her mother saved her life because of her leaps. "I owe her my existence three times". These three leaps the narrator owes her life might be: when Anna Saves herself when she falls from the trapeze, when she falls in love with the narrator's father, and when she saves the narrator life from a fire by climbing to the room where the narrator is trapped.
The correct answer for this question it this one: "<span>A. However." </span><span>The paragraph uses "compare-contrast" organization. The paragraph itself gives us the differences and similarities of coal and petroleum. Words such as the "on the other hand," "while," and "however" can be used as signals or clues that the paragraph is organized as compare-contrast one.</span>