Answer: Nominal damages
Explanation:
Nominal damages is issued when a legal mistake has been committed or when a legal proceeding is wrong but has not lead to any financial loss to the plaintiff. It is a legal way of compensation for the plaintiff in violation of human right. The damages always comes as a token of $1 to $2 depending on the case, this happens when plaintiff cannot provide prove for the loss to be compensated.
The statement that is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading is: The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit.
What is protocol?
Protocol can be defined as a set of guideline or policy that is expected of a person or an individual to follow or abide by.
Since parents or students have the right to ask that a school correct education records in which they tend to believe to be inaccurate or misleading. The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading.
Learn more about protocol here:brainly.com/question/5660386
#SPJ1
Answer:
the answer is C?
Explanation:
it is the only one that sounds right.
Answer and Explanation:
Jusnaturalist School: According to this school, a law must, above all, directly address the promotion of justice in any type of situation, respecting the maximum natural right of the individual, which is an inalienable right that must be respected at any cost. . Based on this school, the situation shown in the question above is inadmissible, as it does not promote justice, it prevents innocent people from traveling via respecting their religion and still hurts their natural right.
Teleological School: This school has a strong political character and states that a law that achieves a social balance and promotes and is the service of protection and promotion of policies that protect society, it is valid. In relation to the case shown in the question above, this school can claim that the law is correct, since there have already been many cases of terrorism caused by Muslims, making their ban on boarding a promotion of social security.
2. When analyzing these two schools of legal thought in relation to the case shown in the question above, I came to the conclusion that the Jusnaturalist school is the one I most agree with. This is because prohibiting Muslim women from boarding an airplane because of terorist cases that they were not part of is a strong example of religious prejudice and intolerance, in addition to hurting the rights of innocent women.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
as you go on 1st offence 2nd offence 3rd offence and so forth it gets worse depending on how bad your first offence will be 6 months to a year
