Answer:
USING 0% DISCOUNT RATE
PROJECT E
Year Cashflow [email protected]% PV
$ $
0 (23,000) 1 (23,000)
1 5,000 1 5,000
2 6000 1 6,000
3 7000 1 7,000
4 10,000 1 10,000
NPV 5,000
PROJECT H
Year Cashflow [email protected]% PV
$ $
0 (25,000) 1 (23,000)
1 16,000 1 16,000
2 5,000 1 5,000
3 4,000 1 4,000
NPV 2,000
Project A should be accepted
USING 9% DISCOUNT RATE
Year Cashflow [email protected]% PV
$ $
0 (23,000) 1 (23,000)
1 5,000 0.9174 4,587
2 6000 0.8462 5,077
3 7000 0.7722 5,405
4 10,000 0.7084 7,084
NPV (847)
PROJECT H
Year Cashflow [email protected]% PV
$ $
0 (25,000) 1 (23,000)
1 16,000 0.9714 15,542
2 5,000 0.8462 4,231
3 4,000 0.7722 3,089
NPV (138)
None of the projects should be accepted because they have negative NPV
Explanation:
The question requires the computation of NPV using 0% and 9%.
The cashflows of the two projects will be discounted at 0% and 9%.
The discount factors for each project can be calculated using the formula (1+r)-n. The cashflows of the projects will be multiplied by the discount factors to obtain the present values. NPV is the difference between present values of cash inflows and initial outlay.
Answer:
B. $300,000
Explanation:
Macaw Corporation increased its E & P last year for the entire amount of the deferred gain on the installment sale. Since one-half of the $800,000 gain is included in taxable income in the current year, taxable income should be reduced by this amount to determine current E & P. Therefore, Macaw Corporation’s current year E & P is $600,000 ($1 million taxable income – $400,000 of installment sale gain). Because one-half of the current E & P is allocated to Tracy’s distribution, she has a $300,000 dividend
Answer: price leadership
Explanation: Price leadership is a circumstance where one business, typically the dominant one in its market, sets prices that its rivals follow closely.
This business is typically the one with the minimum cost of production, thus being able to outperform the prices charged by any rival who tries to set their prices below the price range of the market leader.
Rivals could increase prices than the cost leader, but this would likely lead to lower share of the market unless rivals were able to distinguish their goods adequately.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the given case depicts price leadership strategy.
Answer:
Judy must recognize $4,000 of gross income from the stock for the current year.
True
Explanation:
When you receive stock in lieu of cash for payment for services rendered. you'll first owe income tax based on the value of the stock at that time.
Answer:
<em>Incomplete question is "2. What journal entry should Johnson record to recognize bad debt expense for 2021? 3. Assume Johnson made no other adjustment of the allowance for uncollectible accounts during 2021. Determine the amount of accounts receivable written off during 2021 4. If Johnson instead used the direct write-off method, what would bad debt expense be for 2021?"</em>
1. Gross accounts Receivable = Allowance Account balance at beginning / 10%
= $30,000 / 10%
= $300,000
2. Year Account Title Debit Credit
2021 Bad debt expense $105,000
($500,000*10% + $55,000)
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $105,000
3. Accounts receivable written off = Beginning balance of Allowance Account - Ending Balance of Allowance account
= $30,000 - (- $50,000)
= $30,000 + $50,000
= $80,000
4. Bad debt expense for 2021 (direct write off method) = Amount written off = $80,000