Around that time, men were off in the war, leaving women to work the factory jobs. They had more work as more men fought.
Lol I wouldn’t even dare try to make that
The Olmec influenced the Maya and the Aztecs mostly in religious manner, but there are also social and economic ways.
Explanation:
The Olmec civilization is considered to be the first civilization of Mesoamerica. They are believed to have set the basis for all the later civilizations in the region, and this has been concluded because of the numerous similarities in the region between the Olmec and the later civilizations. The trademark of this civilization are the large, carved, stone heads.
The Olmec didn't had large territory, but they were well developed for their time, so through trade and communication, their more advanced culture spread out in most of the region. Multiple later civilizations of Mesoamerica had pretty much the same religion, similar manner of living, pretty much the same economy, and social hierarchy that was also very similar to the Olmec ones. Some of the most noticeable civilizations that were heavily influenced by the Olmec were:
Learn more about the Maya civilization brainly.com/question/856999
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:Machiavelli’s realism
Niccolò Machiavelli, whose work derived from sources as authentically humanistic as those of Ficino, proceeded along a wholly opposite course. A throwback to the chancellor-humanists Salutati, Bruni, and Poggio, he served Florence in a similar capacity and with equal fidelity, using his erudition and eloquence in a civic cause. Like Vittorino and other early humanists, he believed in the centrality of historical studies, and he performed a signally humanistic function by creating, in La mandragola (1518; The Mandrake), the first vernacular imitation of Roman comedy. His unswerving concentration on human weakness and institutional corruption suggests the influence of Boccaccio; and, like Boccaccio, he used these reminders less as topical satire than as practical gauges of human nature. In one way at least, Machiavelli is more humanistic (i.e., closer to the classics) than the other humanists, for while Vittorino and his school ransacked history for examples of virtue, Machiavelli (true to the spirit of Polybius, Livy, Plutarch, and Tacitus) embraced all of history—good, evil, and indifferent—as his school of reality. Like Salutati, though perhaps with greater self-awareness, Machiavelli was ambiguous as to the relative merits of republics and monarchies. In both public and private writings—especially the Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio (1531; Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy)—he showed a marked preference for republican government, but in The Prince (1532) he developed, with apparent approval, a model of radical autocracy. For this reason, his goals have remained unclear.
Explanation:
