Inferences in book The Most dangerous game

English

2 answers:

alexira [117]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Rainsford kills Zaroff

Explanation:

At the end of the short story, Rainsford wills the most dangerous game and later on, Rainsford duels Zaroff and Rainsford sleeps comfortably in his bed.

I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for but I hope this helps! :)

mars1129 [50]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The Honorable: Zaroff. Despite the barbaric intent of General Zaroff's desire to hunt human beings, he still displays a sense of honor and chivalry that he must have maintained from his military days. When he announces that he plans to hunt Rainsford that night, Rainsford wonders what he can expect if the impossible happens--if he wins

Rainsford the Soldier: Rainsford's war service is never directly discussed, but a single allusion suggests that he was also a World War I veteran.

Rainsford the Killer: We don't know for certain that Rainsford killed Zaroff, but it can be inferred that he had reverted to a savage himself by the final line of the story:

You might be interested in

Early poets used which poetic techniques to make poems easier to remember?

Elza [17]

Early poets used meter and rhythm poetic techniques to make poems easier to remember- APEXVS.COM

8 0

2 years ago

Why do you think an “enemy” or scapegoat is necessary for the animals? Why does the “enemy” have to change? If there were no “en

kaheart [24]

Explanation:

The scapegoat is to serve as a deterrent for others, to let them know there are consequences for each action. The enemy changed from the farm owner to the animals themselves. If there were no enemies there would be no need of a scapegoat, we can finally have a society that one doesn't need to watch his back always

6 0

3 years ago

Why does the narrator in Langston Hughes's short story "Why, You Reckon?" agree to rob a white person? A) He has a criminal past

viva [34]

The main reason why the narrator in Langston Hughes's short story "Why, You Reckon?" agrees to rob a white person is because he <span>has been treated badly and now hates white people. The reader is able to empathize with this. </span>

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Jonathan Edwards, a Puritan pastor from Massachusetts, lived from 1703 to 1758. At 23 he became the pastor of the church at Nort

babunello [35]

We can infer here that Jonathan Edwards made use of pathos to appeal to the emotions of his congregation. Also, his emotional appeal was actually effective because it led the people to weeping and crying for their sins. The logical fallacy that can be seen here is when he stated that their wickedness makes them as it were heavy as lead.

<h3>What is logical fallacy?</h3>

Logical fallacy is actually known as a flawed or false argument which can actually be proven wrong if reasoned. It can also be known to be a faulty reasoning.

"Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" is known to be a sermon that was preached by Jonathan Edwards. The effect of the preaching led the congregation crying and wailing for their sins.

Learn more about logical fallacy on brainly.com/question/1971023

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago

Write a letter to a friend describing the impact of Corona pandemic on you

kogti [31]

Hi, I have to tell you so many things about this pandemic that’s happening right now in this world. So first of all I can’t go out much, so I am limited to what I eat, I can’t have my choice of dinner because some of the shops are closed. And the second thing is that me and you and our friends can spend time together like we used to. We can’t go to birthday party and etc. But the main problem is money, many people in the world lost their jobs because of limited costumers, and that makes me sad. Even some of the people in my job have lost their jobs, but I am fortunate to still stay in the job. Well I hope you and your family’s doing fine,Bye.

8 0

3 years ago