1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GREYUIT [131]
3 years ago
7

The resolution of a moniter is measured in​

History
2 answers:
zubka84 [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The resolution of a monitor is measured in picture elements, or "pixels" for short. Pixels are tiny dots that display on a computer monitor in one of millions of colors, shades and hues.

Explanation:

Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: In digital measurement, the display resolution would be given in pixels per inch (PPI). In analog measurement, if the screen is 10 inches high, then the horizontal resolution is measured across a square 10 inches wide.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Using a real-world example, discuss how a producer might attempt to create demand for a product
jeka57 [31]
A producer might attempt to demand create for a product because they may be out of business or they want more income
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were the Hebrews important ?
amm1812

Answer:

Unlike the Greeks and Romans, the ancient Hebrews were not known for being scientists or philosophers or conquerors. It was their religion, Judaism, that proved to be of crucial importance in world history, both for its own sake and for being the religious root of Christianity and Islam.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Proclaim definition
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

Proclaim is to announce officially or publicly. (Declare something one considers important with due emphasis.)

7 0
3 years ago
Chaldean king who revolted against the Assyrians
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

I belive its C Nabopolassar

Explanation:

hope it helps

5 0
2 years ago
Write a 100-word speech about who is a good servant leader.​
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

The concept of servant leadership was developed by Robert Greenleaf in 1970. According to him, servant leadership was based on the philosophy that for leaders to be effective, they must have the passion to serve others. He was disturbed by the many instances where leaders wanted to lead or become leaders first so as to serve people.

His argument was that if people and organizations were to put service first, they were able to transform the world and make it a better place to live.

He argued that servant leadership was the key to the realization of a world with justice; a world where people were not driven by their self interests but the desire and passion to stand for those who are oppressed and those who are not able to articulate their feelings in a highly competitive and biased world.

Kurt Lewin outlined three broad categories of leadership namely autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire. These types of leadership are distinguished by the characteristics of the leaders and the techniques they use in their leadership.

The autocratic type of leadership is characterized by failure to share power with others. In an organizational context, autocratic leaders are the sole decision makers and they perceive the other employees simply as objects which are not capable of making any decision.

Democratic leadership is the opposite of autocratic leadership. This leadership is sometimes referred to as participative leadership because the leaders lead through bringing everybody on board in decision making with the idea that inclusiveness brings about sustainability as far as realization of organizational goals and objectives is concerned. With this style, all members of the team are involved in identifying essential goals and strategies for attaining those goals.

Servant leadership falls under the category of democratic leadership which is characterized by the inclusion of everybody in making decisions which affect their work and their organizations at large.

The laissez-faire type of leadership is actually not leadership at all because people just do as they wish. This type of leadership lacks a central authority responsible for making decisions. It is rare to find organizations with this type of leadership today.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the term used for a form of government that has a king or queen but also includes a statement of citizen rights and gove
    5·1 answer
  • What were the sources of information about the<br>delhi sutanate ?​
    14·1 answer
  • The Kerner Commission blamed the problems of inner cities on
    9·1 answer
  • Hurry please!!!!! Why did independent city-states develope in ancient Greece? Choose all answers that are correct. (A) Some of t
    14·2 answers
  • Who/what was at fault for this cause for black tuesday and why
    15·2 answers
  • In the constitution ...
    9·1 answer
  • The transfer of power from the central government to a state or local government is called
    14·2 answers
  • All I am asking is please help. You can always ask me any questions you have about this in the comments. Whoever has the best an
    9·1 answer
  • At Central H.S. in Little Rock Arkansas 9 black<br>students wanted...​
    6·1 answer
  • What happens during a period of inflation?<br> Do not look for the answer from the web please.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!