Answer:
The democratic party was dominant in Texas because there were more lower seats than there were upper seats in the house. Since there were more lower seats the democratic party was more dominant because the more votes casts is what gets over ruled. They weren't very organized because they didn't have anything planned, and when it came to voting, they weren't sure what to do
Explanation:
I did this a while back and had something along these lines and I think I got it right :] good luck!! sorry if it's wrong!
I'm gonna say yes? Hope this helped you out.
"<span>b. An interest group is more likely than a political party to support an extreme policy position" is true since interest groups are usually focussed on specific policies. </span>
I do not know the answer, but if I were to guess, that it would be the one about plantations.
Plantations were hotspots of manual labor, specifically slaves. And when slaves were outlawed the plantation owners lose there main source of “profit” (aka the need to not pay workers for manual labor and instead use that money to get more laborers) it seems like the logical answer to me.
Also using process of elimination we know that the war could have spilt the country in two. So the union was indeed saved.
