Regulations exist according to the Green New Deal signed in the UN and applied rather loosely inside the country.
Explanation:
The green new deal is basically responsible for the laws that are being written over the use of plastic and its manufacture and shipping in the country due to the volatility of plastic products in the environmental sphere and how terribly they have been responsible for global warming.
The laws according to the Green New Deals regulate the making of plastic in function to its consumption, effect to the environment and the decay rate.
The mayor of the city where the homeowners live
A potential risk is confusing the customers - customers have brand loyalty and recognition based off of the look and familiarity of packaging. They might always reach for the "green tic tacs" without even knowing the official flavor because they are familiar with the color, and changing the packaging could affect that.
However, a potential benefit of changing the packaging is attracting new customers who would have otherwise overlooked the product. Making the packaging new and exciting might entice new people to become buyers.
A good way to test this would be with focus groups, which are groups of people who you ask to pretend to be the customer and give you feedback on the idea. Focus groups are a good way to learn the good and bad perceptions about a change before it is put into effect.
Answer:
(NPV) Net present value method is the most effective capital budgeting method
Explanation:
we know here
initial after minus tax cost = $5,000,000
after minus tax cash flows in 1st year = $1,800,000
and in 2nd year = $2,900,000
and in 3rd year = $2,700,000
and 4th year is = $2,300,000
so here cash outflows even after the initial outlay in year 0
so we not use here IRR
so that best and most most effective capital budgeting method is NPV net present value
we use it NPV
Answer:
The answer is: $4,522
Explanation:
Since Stanford doesn't operate in the restaurant business and doesn't buy the restaurant, he cannot deduct any amount for investigation costs relating to the restaurant.
Stanford doesn't operate in the bakery business but he bought the bakery, so he can deduct up to $5,000 (before amortization) for investigation costs related to the bakery. But those $5,000 are reduced by every dollar he spent over $50,000, so he can only deduct $4,000 [= $5,000 - ($51,000 - $50,000)].
The remaining $47,000 (= $51,000 - $4,000) can be amortized over 180 months, which equals $261 per month (= $47,000 / 180 months).
Since he bought the restaurant in November, he can deduct two months: $261 per month x 2 months = $522
So his total deduction for investigation expenses is = $4,000 + $522 = $4,522
