Answer:
C.) The French Revolution eventually led to the rise of a powerful dictator, while the American Revolution created a lasting republic; for apex at least. :) Hope it helps!
Explanation:
One reason the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 angered Northerners was that it required all citizens to support the slave system.
Further Explanation:
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was part of the Compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 was one of many pieces of legislation that tried to solve the issue of slavery within the US.
The Fugitive Slave Act was put in place to benefit Southern slave owners. The goal of this law was to ensure the successful return of runaway slaves to their slave owners in the South. This law made it so that Northerners were legally obligated to return these slaves to their owners in the South.
Many different Northerners disliked this idea, as they did not agree with the institution of slavery. Some Northerners were considered abolitionist, meaning they wanted to get rid of the institution of slavery completely. This forced many Northerners to go against their own beliefs. Along with this, some Northerners ignored the law completely causing increased tensions between the North and South.
Learn More:
Compromise of 1850 Information- brainly.com/question/8165267
Key Details:
Topic: American History, Civil War
Grade Level: 7-12
Keywords: Civil War, Causes of the Civil War, Fugitive Slave Act, Abolitionist
Answer:
The Simon Commission came to India in 1927 to generate a report on how well the 1919 Government of India Act was working. The Government of India Act established the new Indian constitution and Great Britain appointed British officials to the Simon Commission in order to oversee the effectiveness of the constitution.
Explanation:
A) The rise of fascism.
Hitler gained power by heavily opposing the treaty of versailles and being an extreme nationalist making promises to return Germany to a global superpower. People wanted a change so they voted for him.
Answer:
No. In an 8-1 decision authored by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, the Court concluded that the relevant sections of the Enforcement Act lacked the necessary, limiting language to qualify as enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment. The Chief Justice first stated that the Fifteenth Amendment "does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one," but "prevents the States, or the United States, however, from giving preference…to one citizen of the United States over another on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." In examining the language of the Enforcement Act, the Court noted that, while the first two sections of the act explicitly referred to race in criminalizing interference with the right to vote, the relevant third and fourth sections refer only to the "aforesaid" offense. According to the Court, this language does not sufficiently tailor the law to qualify as "appropriate legislation" under the Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
