In some instances, Federal officials expedited the naming process by furnishing the names themselves, and invariably the name would be the same as that of the freedman’s most recent master. But these appear to have been exceptional cases; the ex-slaves themselves usually took the initiative—like the Virginia mother who changed the name of her son from Jeff Davis, which was how the master had known him, to Thomas Grant, which seemed to suggest the freedom she was now exercising. Whatever names the freed slaves adopted, whether that of a previous master, a national leader, an occupational skill, a place of residence, or a color, they were most often making that decision themselves. That was what mattered.
Answer:
enemies
Explanation:
The stamp tax was an increase in taxes on commodities for the colonies in North America. These increases gave no added benefit in return, like representation in government.
Answer: the wooden seats you sit on
Explanation: i don’t know i haven’t been to church in a while :)
There were few government regulations so businesses used ruthless tactics to eliminate their competition.
Answer:
In response to the violence of the Boston Massacre of 1770 and new taxes like the Tea Act of 1773, a group of frustrated colonists protested taxation without representation by dumping 342 chests of tea into Boston Harbor on the night of December 16, 1773 – an event known to history as Boston Tea Party
Explanation:
