Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Kalani’s Argument: My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.
Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).
Which argument is more convincing?
Answer:
Kalani's argument is more convincing.
Explanation:
Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.
The sentence which uses correct punctuation is C. In time, of course, all issues get resolved, but not necessarily in the way you would like.
In A, the comma before <em>he was concerned </em>should be a dash. In B, there should be a colon before <em>a flashlight, </em>not a semi colon. In D, there should be a comma before <em>yet, </em>and not a colon.
Answer: C.It fits the description in every respect of Dean Kamen, the owner of more than one hundred patents.
Explanation: i did it on edge plz mark brainliest
The opportunity cost of going to a night party instead of babysitting at home is:
- The benefit of taking care of the baby adequately and completing your work that you would have gained from babysitting that night.
<h3>What is an opportunity cost?</h3>
This is the loss of value or benefit that would have been incurred by engaging in an activity rather than engaging in an alternative activity.
The opportunity cost in this scenario is the value of what you gave up in other to attend the party, which was to babysit the child and take proper care of the baby.
In conclusion, an opportunity cost is the loss of other alternatives when one alternative is already chosen.
Read more about <em>opportunity cost</em> here:
brainly.com/question/481029