Answer: Since there is no article for this then I'm guessing B because it is more logical than the other options.
Explanation:
The bandwagon fallacy is in the insistence that good cities are good because they have rail.
Explanation:
The bandwagon fallacy is where the causation of something is confused as an effect.<u> It is the argument that because all the great cities of the country have light rail, our city too should have the same light rail system to be as good as them.</u>
This argument falls apart because the rail will not curb the problems that the passage itself talks about and then willfully ignores. I<u>n fact, bringing the rail to town will actually aggravate some of the issues mentioned here</u>. Which is why the argument becomes more weak.
Both W. H. Auden and William Carlos Williams wrote ekphrastic poems about Pieter Brueghel's Landscape with the Fall of Icarus. Both poems point out that Icarus’s drowning is ignored or goes unnoticed. Williams's poem uses short groups of three lines and an objective tone. Auden's poem uses longer lines and more description, and it refers to ideas and images outside of the painting. Williams provides a matter-of-fact account of what happens in the painting, while Auden connects the painting to the overall idea of suffering.
Answer:
A. evidence
Explanation:
when writing an argumentative or persuasive essay, the details are always used as evidence
NOT subheadings(that doesn't even make sense)
NOT thesis statements ( the details are trying to prove the thesis, not make more thesis's)
NOT description ( you are not describing anything in an argumentative or persuasive essay you are simply using facts and evidence to prove your point.)
