1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arlik [135]
3 years ago
10

Can someone please help me with this question i will be giving brainliest to the person who helps the most

History
2 answers:
Feliz [49]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

okay voting is so people can "choose" their presidents/ congress, higher authority.  In a democracy, a government is chosen by voting in an election: a way for an electorate to elect, i.e. choose, among several candidates for rule. ... In a direct democracy, voting is the method by which the electorate directly make decisions, turn bills into laws, etc.

Slav-nsk [51]3 years ago
3 0
I think that the correct answer is true
You might be interested in
"Which New Deal agency was created to provide employment for individuals such as the man in the photograph?
Dafna1 [17]
<span>If my memory seves me well, correct answer is (3) Works Progress Administration (WPA).</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What was the English Bill of Rights?
cupoosta [38]
B is the answer cause the parlilment provided protection for the english  citzens

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The purpose of the passenger list maintained by the transportation security administration is to keep people who are possible th
Anon25 [30]

In order to keep off people who have some form of threats off the airplanes, the passenger list are maintained and mornitored by the Transportation Security Administration.

<h3>What is the passenger list?</h3>

The passenger list refers to a manifest of passenger that contains their details while on course of a journey to another location

Hence, these passenger list are monitored and maintained to keep people who are possible threats off airplanes.

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about passenger list

<em>brainly.com/question/19268349</em>

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it? Why or why not?
Vlada [557]
This is a matter of opinion.  Do YOU think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it?  Let's look at the factors.

What were some of the positives?  Well, firstly, it ended World War II.  That's kind of a big deal.  In fact, it caused Japan not only to surrender, but UNCONDITIONALLY surrender.  Basically, that means the US could ask Japan to do whatever it liked--which the US liked!  Secondly, it was a triumph of science.  The atomic bomb was a revolutionary work of science.  Nothing like it had ever been made before, and it was all based on secrecy and theoretical science.  The atomic bomb also <span>provided the basis for new, improved weapons, including the hydrogen bomb.  </span>Thirdly, it helped establish the United States as a world power.  Knowing about this super powerful weapon the US had, countries were likely to back off!  

But there's a lot of negatives here, too.  Keep in mind that most of these benefits were for the United States alone.  Of course, there was one other BIG negative for the United States, and that's cost.  The atomic bomb was worth billions of dollars!  A second big one wasn't so much for the United States as for the world, especially Japan.  When the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the effects on the people and city were devastating.  People were vaporized.  Cities and buildings were flattened, and nothing is left but carnage.  People died, their skin peeling off, from cancer and radiation.  It was awful!  Thirdly, it caused the arms race.  Knowing the US had this super weapon, ALL the countries started building their own.  Now, we pretty much live in fear of all the nuclear weapons there are today--which are hundreds of times more powerful each than the first bomb!

So what do you think?  Was it worth it?
6 0
4 years ago
Compare the use of brick in Egyptian architecture as opposed to other ancient near eastern societies, such as the Mesopotamian S
hoa [83]

Answer:  At that time the artists of Egypt had no intention of being famous with their temples, the creations had ideological purpose, to show the power of society.

In both Egypt and Mesopotamia, the creations were grand, meant to show the power of the elite of both nations.

Rich architectures with palaces and temples, in Egypt, with tombs. Most pyramids were built like tombs of Pharaohs.

The main manifestations of Mesopotamian architecture were the palaces, usually very grand; As there was little stone, the walls had to be thick as they were made of bricks. The temples had complete facilities, with rooms for priests and other compartments. A characteristic feature of this architecture was the “Ziggurat”, a  seven story tower tower, on which was a chapel used to observe the sky.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did pepin the short strengthen the frankish kingdom
    8·1 answer
  • (a) During the Middle Ages, the Church was the supreme power in Europe. But by 1500, some people challenged that authority with
    10·2 answers
  • How did the native Americans fight against attempts to remove them
    5·2 answers
  • For which group of americans did the delcaration of independence raise hopes
    13·1 answer
  • How long did it take to build the Erie Canal?
    14·1 answer
  • Which outstanding u.S. Army officer chose to lead confederate forces out of loyalty to his state?
    8·1 answer
  • What can be said about the slave trade?
    10·1 answer
  • Why can the Northwest Ordinance be considered a successful action by Congress under the Articles of Confederation?
    5·1 answer
  • Which phrase best describes the style of the Christ as Good Shepherd mosaic from the Mausoleum of Galla Placidia at Ravenna
    5·1 answer
  • The Sherman Anti-Trust Act was created
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!