I think it's B because a they have to review the original record since it is their job to decide whether the lower court decision was constitutional. And to do their job they also have to consider the arguements for each side. On a appeal no new facts are presented (fun fact). Frankly it's just my opinion, but B seems the most logical.
i can only think of these but i hope it helps anyway :)
1. standardized weights and measures
2. seal carving
3. metallurgy with copper, bronze, lead, and tin.
Answer:Mutually assured destruction is a military mental model with powerful applications in life and business. It refers to a situation where two parties are in a stalemate, and neither can make a move without causing their own destruction. Here’s why this happens and how we can avoid putting ourselves in situations where playing means losing.
“A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.”
Explanation:
This possibly led to the creation of small and new countries that were once colonies of bigger countries
ship building and fishing
