Answer:
Locke was a “reluctant” democrat because he favored a representative government, while Rousseau an “extreme” democrat because he believed everyone should vote. Rousseau argued that the general will of the people could not be decided by elected representatives. He believed in a direct democracy in which everyone voted to express the general will and to make the laws of the land. Rousseau had in mind a democracy on a small scale, a city-state like his native Geneva. John Locke refuted the theory of the divine right of kings and argued that all persons are endowed with natural rights to life, liberty, and property and that rulers who fail to protect those rights may be removed by the people, by force if necessary.
Explanation:
The answer choice which represents a consequence of candidate-centered electoral campaigns is; Choice C; A decrease in the amount of money spent on political campaigns.
<h3>Candidate-centered electoral campaigns: Consequence</h3>
Candidate-centered politics are election campaigns and other political processes characterized by the fact that candidates, not political parties, have most of the initiative and influence.
The consequence of such electoral campaigns is a decrease in the amount of money spent on political campaigns.
Read more on candidate-centered electoral campaigns;
brainly.com/question/15218154
Answer:
Endangered Species Act of 1973
Explanation:
The Endangered Species Act of 1973 was signed into law by president Richard Nixon. The Act provides legal measures for the protection of endangered species in the U.S. territory.
The provisions of the Act are enforced by the National Marine Fisheries Service, a division of the U.S. Department of Interior, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, a division of the NOAA ( the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).
The act classifies endangered species in four categories: delisted, threatened, endangered, and extinct.
Answer:
I am Adam Smith
Explanation:
Dear Karl Marx
I write to you to explain, respectfully, why your economic theories are wrong.
First of all, capitalism is not doomed to fail as you say. Capitalism is the best economic system we have developed so far. Capitalism allows the free movement of goods and services, and the accumulation of capital, which leads to economic growth, and the subsequent rise in the standards of living. You yourself recognize this fact.
Secondly, capitalism is not fundamentally unfair. It is true that entrepreneurs tend to earn more than workers, but this is because they risk more than them: they risk their capital and savings, and if the business fails, they could find themselves ruined and in debt.
Finally, I do understand that there are flaws with the system, and I support intelligent intervention to solve these flaws. But it is not socialism nor communism what will solve those flaws.
Sincelery, Adam Smith.
