Ikr man Washington was a crazy dude
Answer:
ive gotchu i love wrinkle in time
Explanation:
There is a girl named Meg Murray who falls pretty short in her academics and gets into trouble quite often. her brother Charles-Wallace is incredibly smart though and is seen as weird. Meg and Charles-Wallace meet a boy named Calvain Kein while they are walking there dog one day and the three of them go into an abandoned house where Ms. Whatsit Ms. Who and Ms. Which are residing. They then return home and Calvain stays for dinner. Meg helps him in math and he helps her in english. The next day they begin there trek along the universe to find Megs father using whats called a Tesseract. They go onto many planets but finnaly they go to a planet where everything is controlled by this algorithm. The trio then meets a strange man who controlls charles wallace. They find Meg and Charlies dad but Charlie is still being controlled by the dark thing so they leave him behind and go to a planet where there is no light. These strange furry aliens heal Meg and she battles the dark thing for her brother. In the end, Meg wins and tesseracts home. This time however her tesseract is beautiful. It has all these colors. Her mom and dad reunite and their adventure ends. Or does it?
The correct answer is C. Challenging assumptions
Explanation:
A discussion technique refers to different methods that guarantee the discussion is effective or guarantees the exchange of ideas between the participants flows. Common discussion techniques include asking questions, guiding the discussion, stating opposing ideas, challenging assumptions, among others. In the case of challenging assumptions, this discussion technique focuses on re-examining carefully through questions the assumptions or ideas already stated in order to consider them from a different perspective and determine if they are valid or have been just wrongly assumed.
Consider Jennifer is mainly asking questions about the ideas of Daniel in order to make him reconsider ideas from a different perspective it can be concluded she is mainly using challenging assumptions technique in order to challenge the ideas previously assumed about the title of the work. Therefore, in this conversation, the discussion technique Jennifer most clearly shows is challenging assumptions.
The answer is to throw away.
Reject most closely means "to dismiss." The choice "to throw away" would describe how the writer is completely against the idea that he or she is too young to make a difference and "dismisses", disregards and does not accept the idea that he or she is too young to make a difference.
-E :)
