Answer:
Explanation:
Essay On How Animals Are Treated
“Animals should be treated with the same respect as humans”. It is a common belief that a human is superior to any other animal, mainly because of the extended intelligence that the former is gifted with. However, it is my strong conviction that all living things are worthy of the same respect and deserve to be treated with the same consideration. In the first place, I think that people should respect the whole creation of God, including animals. The fact that humans exist with them only means that they are all equals in the eyes of the divine providence, so they should all be respected and protected. Furthermore, it appears that animals have feelings and conscience too and having a pet as a companion can teach one a sense of responsibility. A striking example of their intelligence and nobility is the fact that pets are often specially trained to help their blind or deaf owners. In contrast, there are those who claim that, because animals are less evolved than humans, they do not possess the same awareness of the world and represent pottial enemies. Were this true, animals would have already taken over the world as they do in the science fiction movies. While it cannot be denied that humans are the most intelligent and complex creatures on earth, it is my firm belief that animals also deserve respect and appreciation. I believe they are necessary in our lives, as we are in theirs.
Do I need to use your user name or do you want me to make up a name?
Answer:
here!
Explanation:
John Locke → Second Treatise on Government
Thomas Hobbes → Leviathan
Samuel Johnson → A Dictionary of the English Language
John Dryden → Annus Mirabilis
The correct answer is <span>she appreciates Miss Maudie's defense of Atticus.
Grace Merriweater (indirectly) blames Atticus </span>for stirring up the local black population because of his defense of Tom Robinson. Alexandra didn't have the guts to defend Atticus, but Maudie did.
In his majority opinion on Tinker v. Des Moines, Justice Fortas argues that free speech would not truly exist if people could only express their opinion in a designated place.
