1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vodka [1.7K]
3 years ago
9

Why was Yellowstone national park created

History
1 answer:
o-na [289]3 years ago
5 0
The Yellowstone Act of 1872 designated the region as a public “pleasuring-ground,” which would be preserved “from injury or spoilation, of all timber, mineral deposits, natural curiosities, or wonders within.” For a nation bent on settling and exploiting the West, the creation of Yellowstone was surprising.
You might be interested in
Why did the government create permanent armies?
avanturin [10]

Answer:

Territory

Explanation:

They helped control more territory

3 0
2 years ago
In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court ruled that in business disputes
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What push factor is a main reason for Mexican emigration to other nations?
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

Higher wages

Explanation: This question is attempting to explain the reasons for migration. Push and pull factors play a role in the decision of human beings to leave one place or country and migrate elsewhere.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
ALL of the colonies sent delegates to the Constitutional Convention
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Gerogia did not attend

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The civil rights leader who battled discrimination in war-related jobs was
    11·1 answer
  • What vision of the nation does lincoln describe at the close of his speech?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following ended russias involvement in world war 1
    15·1 answer
  • PLZZZ HELP I'LL GIVR U A MEDAL N FAN U
    15·2 answers
  • The World Bank is made up of which of the following institutions?
    11·1 answer
  • The Lusitania ran aground on the shore of<br> Germany.<br> True or false
    7·1 answer
  • How were most women affected by the postwar era?
    15·2 answers
  • True or False? The Pope granted the Portuguese a monopoly on colonizing the New World
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following best explains why property rights are necessary in a free-market system?
    12·1 answer
  • Which practice of american government is reflected in disexpert
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!