Answer:
Between 1830 and 1850, immigrants who moved to American cities often faced crowded living conditions in poor neighborhoods. The Industrial Revolution opened many new job opportunities for people. Americans that lived in the rural areas of the country moved to the larger cities where the factories were located.
Answer:
There is no cause for concern because human population growth is not correlated with the global ecological footprint.
Explanation:
The methodology of the ecological footprint is very wrong in that that it ignores the growth of the human population. The human population is not static in its numbers, and over the past century it increased significantly. Despite the slower growth nowadays, the population is still going up, and each individual should be taken into consideration for the ecological footprint because everyone has influence over it. If this is totally ignored, than the results and projections will be very misguiding and wrong, so it is an issue that has to be addressed so that the problem can be solved on the basis on correct and reliable data.
Answer:
The hypothesis can you reasonably make regarding the atmosphere of Planet X "The atmosphere of Planet X has a higher concentration of greenhouse gasses than Earth's does."
Explanation:
A greenhouse gas is a gas that captivates and produces healthy vigor within the updraft infrared choice. Greenhouse gases reason the greenhouse consequence on planets. The main greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone. Many GHG's, including water vapor (the most important), ozone, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, are obviously current in the atmosphere. Other GHG's are artificial chemicals that are produced only as a consequence of human activity.
Answer: clearly it will grow, but I’m not sure that’s the answer you want
Explanation:
