Basically they have the right to defend themselves in front of a Grand jury, unless in time of war,they have the right of a fair judgement, they cannot be judged twice for the same offence after being convicted or acquitted, neither is the person obliged to produce evidence against themselves.
An example of Napoleon being a child of the Enlightenment is his Napoleonic Code (1804) which contained ideals such as legal equality and religious toleration (both Enlightenment based).
However, an example of Napoleon not being a child of the Enlightenment is the Consulate (1799-1804). The consulate was a representative government, like a Republic. Napoleon promised male suffrage and legislature within this government, but in reality he has full power. In addition to this, he censored the press to his will—not a Enlightenment action.
(You could go both ways with this argument, but those are the examples I could provide, there could be more.)
