Answer and Explanation:
Wealthy interest groups have a lot of power in the Texas government because of their involvement in state policy and because of their social and economic influence within the state. Although this is common in any state in the country, the influence and power of these groups must have limits, as they can act in their own interests, without taking into account the state's political progress. Religious groups must also have limits on their political influence in the state government, as they can impose Christian (or other religions) concepts, which in addition to weakening people's religious freedom, can interfere with political rationality.
Generally they can no loger drive car in insurgent or formerly insurgent controlled areas, they must walk right along the side of the road so they don't get blown up by land mines. Generally many fled because land mines ruined their lives even after the insurgents left.
Answer:
Scenario: Cleanshot USA in Russia When Cleanshot USA, a photography products company, decided to enter the international arena, it chose Russia as its main market. Although Russia has been in transition for years, Cleanshot managers believe their company has tremendous opportunities there. Which of the following challenges is clean shot most likely to face in Russia?
Explanation:
They are most likely to face low demand for the products of non-Russian companies.
Answer:
es el demandante
Explanation:es la persona que tiene problemas y quiere llevarse acabo una audiencia.
The American Revolution was not a civil war because a “civil war” is typically between two groups within the same country. For instance, Parliament and the King fought each other in the English Civil War. Similar conflicts occurred between the Union and the Confederacy during the American Civil War.
Contrarily, the American Revolution was a conflict between a colonizer and a colony. Usually, these are not referred to as "civil wars," but rather as "rebellions," "revolts," or (to their supporters) "wars of liberation."
Any of these might constitute a "revolution," so long as it alters society, the economy, and culture fundamentally as well as the leadership. As you can expect, this makes the word "revolution" very political. The proponents of change refer to it as a "revolution," whilst the opponents use a less admirable term.
The Civil War would have been referred to as a "revolution" if the Confederacy had prevailed, and the Union may have even done so at some point. Instead, it fell short, and now we refer to the conflict of 1861–1865 as a civil war. It's just another instance of how the winners write history.