Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.
Yes they do have responsibilities to their comminuty/society
Answer:
probably electronics/the internet
Explanation:
This Chinese dynasty (ca. 1600–1046 B.C.), which ruled central China during the Bronze Age, is primarily known for its ritual bronze vessels, such as wine, food and water containers, since food and drink were part of the rituals that were celebrated by the elite.
Ritual bronze vessels are very unique, as a result of their complex surface decoration and their varied shapes. One of the most characteristic motifs is in the shape of a mask, which features a frontal view of a creature with prominent eyes.
Bronze was also used to fashion weapons, parts of chariots and other luxurious objects.
Answer:
we can ensure equality to all by
Explanation:
not being racist sexist or acting in any different kind of way around other's and to not accept stereotype as facts but as lies.another thing is that people around the world don't have enough food or water to survive so to ensure equity we must be more helpful to those around us and people in need.
